首页> 外文期刊>Marketing Science >Competitive Price Targeting with Smartphone Coupons
【24h】

Competitive Price Targeting with Smartphone Coupons

机译:使用智能手机优惠券进行有竞争力的价格定位

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

With the cooperation of a large mobile service provider, we conduct a novel field experiment that simultaneously randomizes the prices of two competing movie theaters using mobile coupons. Unlike studies that vary only one firm's prices, our experiment allows us to account for competitor response. We test mobile targeting based on consumers' real-time and historic locations, allowing us to evaluate popular mobile coupon strategies in a competitive market. The experiment reveals substantial profit gains from mobile discounts during an off-peak period. Both firms could create incremental profits by targeting their competitor's location. However, the returns to such "geoconquesting" are reduced when the competitor also launches its own targeting campaign. We combine our experimentally generated data with a demand model to analyze optimal pricing in a static Bertrand-Nash equilibrium. Interestingly, competitive responses raise the profitability of behavioral targeting where symmetric pricing incentives soften price competition. By contrast, competitive responses lower the profitability of geographic targeting, where asymmetric pricing incentives toughen price competition. If we endogenize targeting choice, both firms would choose behavioral targeting in equilibrium, even though more granular geobehavioral targeting combining both real-time and historic locations is possible. These findings demonstrate the importance of considering competitor response when piloting novel price-targeting mechanisms.
机译:在大型移动服务提供商的合作下,我们进行了新颖的现场实验,同时使用移动优惠券随机分配了两个竞争电影院的价格。与仅改变一家公司价格的研究不同,我们的实验使我们能够解释竞争对手的反应。我们根据消费者的实时和历史位置测试了移动定位,从而使我们能够在竞争激烈的市场中评估流行的移动优惠券策略。该实验表明,在非高峰时段,通过移动折扣可以获得可观的利润。两家公司都可以通过定位竞争对手的位置来创造增量利润。但是,当竞争对手也发起自己的定位活动时,这种“地理征服”的收益就会减少。我们将实验产生的数据与需求模型结合起来,以分析静态Bertrand-Nash均衡中的最优定价。有趣的是,竞争性响应提高了行为目标定位的获利能力,而对称定价激励措施软化了价格竞争。相比之下,竞争性响应会降低地理定位的获利能力,因为不对称的定价激励会加剧价格竞争。如果我们将目标选择内生化,那么两家公司都会选择均衡的行为目标,即使结合实时和历史位置的更精细的地理行为目标也是可能的。这些发现表明,在尝试新颖的价格定位机制时,考虑竞争对手的反应非常重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号