首页> 外文期刊>Marine Geodesy >Extracting Shallow-Water Bathymetry from Lidar Point Clouds Using Pulse Attribute Data: Merging Density-Based and Machine Learning Approaches
【24h】

Extracting Shallow-Water Bathymetry from Lidar Point Clouds Using Pulse Attribute Data: Merging Density-Based and Machine Learning Approaches

机译:使用脉冲属性数据从LIDAR点云中提取浅水浴约定:合并基于密度和机器学习方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

To automate extraction of bathymetric soundings from lidar point clouds, two machine learning (ML1) techniques were combined with a more conventional density-based algorithm. The study area was four data "tiles" near the Florida Keys. The density-based algorithm determined the most likely depth (MLD) for a grid of "estimation nodes" (ENs). Unsupervised k-means clustering determined which EN's MLD depth and associated soundings represented ocean depth rather than ocean surface or noise to produce a preliminary classification. An extreme gradient boosting (XGB) model was fitted to pulse return metadata - e.g. return intensity, incidence angle - to produce a final Bathy/NotBathy classification. Compared to an operationally produced reference classification, the XGB model increased global accuracy and decreased the false negative rate (FNR) - i.e. undetected bathymetry - that are most important for nautical navigation for all but one tile. Agreement between the final XGB and operational reference classifications ranged from 0.84 to 0.999. Imbalance between Bathy and NotBathy was addressed using a probability decision threshold that equalizes the FNR and the true positive rate (TPR). Two methods are presented for visually evaluating differences between the two classifications spatially and in feature-space.
机译:为了自动提取LIDAR点云的沐浴探测,两种机器学习(ML1)技术与更传统的基于密度的算法组合。研究区是佛罗里达群岛附近的四个数据“瓷砖”。基于密度的算法确定了“估计节点”网格的最可能的深度(MLD)(ENS)。无监督的K-Means聚类确定哪个EN的MLD深度和相关探测代表了海洋深度而不是海面或噪音,以产生初步分类。极端梯度升压(XGB)模型安装在脉冲返回元数据中 - 例如返回强度,入射角 - 产生最终的沐浴/臭味的分类。与操作产生的参考分类相比,XGB模型增加了全球精度并降低了假负速率(FNR) - 即未检测到的沐浴物质 - 除了一个瓷砖的航海导航最重要。最终XGB和操作参考分类之间的协议范围为0.84至0.999。使用概率判定阈值来解决浴性和臭味之间的不平衡,该概率判断为FNR和真正的阳性率(TPR)。提出了两种方法,用于视觉评估空间和特征空间的两个分类之间的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号