首页> 外文期刊>Manufacturing and service operations management >Patient Prioritization in Emergency Department Triage Systems: An Empirical Study of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS)
【24h】

Patient Prioritization in Emergency Department Triage Systems: An Empirical Study of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS)

机译:急诊分诊系统中患者的优先次序:加拿大分诊和敏锐度量表(CTAS)的实证研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Emergency departments (EDs) typically use a triage system to classify patients into priority levels. However, most triage systems do not specify how exactly to route patients across and within the assigned triage levels. Therefore, decision makers in EDs often have to use their own discretion to route patients. Also, how patient waiting is perceived and accounted for in ED operations is not clearly understood. In this paper, using patient-level ED visit data, we structurally estimate the waiting cost structure of ED patients as perceived by the decision makers who make ED patient routing decisions. We derive policy implications and make suggestions for improving triage systems. We analyze the patient routing behaviors of ED decision makers in four EDs in the metro Vancouver, British Columbia, area. They all use the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale, which has a wait time-related target service level objective. We propose a general discrete choice framework, consistent with queueing literature, as a tool to analyze prioritization behaviors in multiclass queues under mild assumptions. We find that the decision makers in all four EDs (1) apply a delay-dependent prioritization across different triage levels; (2) have a perceived marginal ED patient waiting cost that is best fit by a piece-wise linear concave function in wait time; (3) generally follow, in the same triage level, the first-come first-served principle, but their adherence to the principle decreases for patients who wait past a certain threshold; and (4) do not use patient complexity as a major criterion in prioritization decisions.
机译:急诊科(ED)通常使用分类系统将患者分类为优先级别。但是,大多数分诊系统都没有指定如何在指定的分诊级别之间和之内准确路由患者。因此,急诊科的决策者常常不得不运用自己的判断力来路由患者。而且,在急诊室操作中如何感知和解释患者的等待方式还不清楚。在本文中,我们使用患者级别的急诊就诊数据,从结构上估计了急诊患者的等待费用结构,这是由急诊患者路由决策的决策者所感知的。我们得出政策含义,并提出有关改进分类系统的建议。我们分析了不列颠哥伦比亚省温哥华市区的四个急诊室中急诊室决策者的患者路线选择行为。他们都使用加拿大分流和敏锐度量表,该量表具有与等待时间相关的目标服务水平目标。我们提出一个与排队文献相一致的通用离散选择框架,作为在温和假设下分析多类队列中优先级行为的工具。我们发现,所有四个ED中的决策者(1)在不同的分类级别上应用依赖于延迟的优先级; (2)感觉到的边缘ED患者的等待成本最适合等待时间的分段线性凹函数; (3)通常在相同的分类中遵循先到先得的原则,但是等待超过一定阈值的患者对原则的依从性降低; (4)在确定优先次序时,不要将患者的复杂性作为主要标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号