首页> 外文期刊>The Manchester school >Good volatility vs. bad volatility: The asymmetric impact of financial depth on macroeconomic volatility
【24h】

Good volatility vs. bad volatility: The asymmetric impact of financial depth on macroeconomic volatility

机译:良好的波动性与不良波动性:财务深度对宏观经济波动的不对称影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper explores the possibility that financial depth may have an asymmetric impact on macroeconomic volatility by affecting its "good" and "bad" components in different ways. While "good" volatility refers to positive shocks to gross domestic product, consumption and investment growth, "bad" volatility denotes negative fluctuations in these macroeconomic indicators. Dynamic panel regressions in a sample of 97 countries over the period 1960-2010 provide evidence of asymmetry on three main grounds. First, financial depth reduces good volatility but does not have much impact on bad volatility except that it reduces some bad volatility of consumption. Second, though financial depth reduces both good and bad volatility of consumption, the reduction in the good component is much greater. Third, Second, the impact of financial depth on macroeconomic volatility varies across sectors. Particularly in low-income economies, financial depth enables better consumption decisions but poorer investment choices. These results have important policy implications.
机译:本文通过以不同方式影响其“良好”和“糟糕”组件,探讨了财务深度可能对宏观经济波动的不对称影响。虽然“良好”的波动性是指国内生产总值的积极冲击,消费和投资增长,“糟糕”波动表示这些宏观经济指标中的负面波动。 1960-2010期间97个国家的样本中的动态面板回归提供了三个主要理由上不对称的证据。首先,财务深度可降低良好的波动性,但对不良波动的影响没有太大影响,除非它会降低消费的一些不良波动性。其次,虽然财务深度减少了消费的良好和不良波动,但良好部件的减少要大得多。第三,第二个,财务深度对宏观经济波动的影响各不相同。特别是在低收入经济体中,财务深度使得能够更好的消费决策,但投资选择较差。这些结果具有重要的政策影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号