...
首页> 外文期刊>Linguistic inquiry >In Defense of What(ever) Free Relative Clauses They Dismiss: A Reply to Donati and Cecchetto (2011)
【24h】

In Defense of What(ever) Free Relative Clauses They Dismiss: A Reply to Donati and Cecchetto (2011)

机译:捍卫(永远)免费的亲戚条款,他们解雇:对Donati和Cecchetto的回复(2011)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I argue that the version of phrase structure theory proposed by Donati and Cecchetto (2011) falls short of accounting for the attested patterns of free relative clauses not only in English but crosslinguistically in general. In particular, I show that free relative clauses can be introduced not only by wh-words like what or where, which is what Donati and Cecchetto predict, but also by wh-phrases like what books or whatever books and their equivalents in other languages, which Donati and Cecchetto explicitly predict not to be possible.
机译:我认为Donati和Cecchetto(2011)提出的短语结构理论的版本缺少不仅在英语中占用的可用相对条款的算法,而且横跨一般。特别地,我表明,不仅可以通过像何处或在哪里的Wh-like介绍免费的相对条款,这也是什么,这也是由Donati和Cecchetto的预测,而且由Wh-短语如什么书籍或其他语言中的书籍和他们的等同物,哪个Donati和Cecchetto明确预测不可能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号