首页> 外文期刊>Library Journal >The Case for Consolidation
【24h】

The Case for Consolidation

机译:合并案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We need fewer public libraries with greater independence. Here at the beginning of the 21st century, public libraries are still saddled with a 19th-century model of government. They are far too beholden to governing authorities, usually municipal or county governments, for their financial sustenance. This is a formula for mediocrity. "Local control" is the watchword of that 19th-century model of government. It is based on the idea that citizens have a right and responsibility to govern themselves and to control issues at the local level, issues that are outside the purview of the state and federal authorities. Zoning, land use policies, public schools, and public libraries are all examples of government services that are usually subject to local control.
机译:我们需要更少的具有更大独立性的公共图书馆。在21世纪初,公共图书馆仍然背负着19世纪的政府模式。他们对财政当局的依赖太过依赖当局,通常是市政府或县政府。这是平庸的公式。 “地方控制”是19世纪政府模式的口号。它基于这样一种思想,即公民有权利和责任来管治自己,并在地方一级控制问题,这些问题是州和联邦当局权限范围之外的。分区,土地使用政策,公立学校和公共图书馆都是通常受当地控制的政府服务的示例。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号