首页> 外文期刊>Library Journal >GOOGLE BOOKS VS.BISON
【24h】

GOOGLE BOOKS VS.BISON

机译:GOOGLE BOOKS VS.BISON

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Just as the Internet is likely to be one of the most disruptive overall technologies of our lifetimes, Google Books may become one of the most disruptive technologies for academic libraries. The immediate challenge is that Google Books' deeper indexing and more advanced relevancy ranking usually works better than that of our local catalogs-and it always returns results. With library catalogs, bigger is better, and one all-inclusive silo is preferable to lots of little ones. Unfortunately, university library catalogs of fewer than five million books are bound to have much overlap with the 80-100 million books that will appear in Google Books in a few years. The total number of books scanned so far is a closely held secret, but Google has claimed to be scanning 3000 items every day. The University of Michigan alone scanned its millionth book for the project back in February 2008.
机译:正如互联网可能是我们一生中最具破坏力的整体技术之一一样,Google图书可能会成为大学图书馆最具破坏力的技术之一。迫在眉睫的挑战是,Google图书的更深入的索引编制和更高级的相关性排名通常比本地目录的效果更好-并且总是返回结果。对于图书馆目录,越大越好,并且一个包罗万象的筒仓比许多小的筒仓更可取。不幸的是,大学图书馆的图书目录少于500万册,必将与几年后出现在Google图书中的80-100百万册图书有很多重叠。到目前为止,扫描的书籍总数是一个秘密秘密,但Google声称每天扫描3000本书。早在2008年2月,仅密歇根大学就扫描了该项目的第百万本书。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号