首页> 外文期刊>Leadership >The Screaming Pope: Imagery and leadership in two paintings of the Pope Innocent X
【24h】

The Screaming Pope: Imagery and leadership in two paintings of the Pope Innocent X

机译:尖叫的教皇:教皇无辜X的两幅画中的意象和领导力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The image of authoritarian figures and leaders inspired many of Francis Bacon's paintings. Among these, his interpretation of the Portrait of Pope Innocent X (1650) by Velazquez represents an exemplary way of revealing the complex dilemmas incorporated within a leader. However, whereas in Velazquez's portrait the Pope appeared regal, serene and inquisitive, Bacon's Study after Velazquez's Portrait of Pope Innocent X (1953) seems to explore the isolation conferred by his authority. The obsession of Bacon with this painting may suggest a wider challenge to contemporary organizational mythology - top managers, businessmen, politicians, CEOs, bankers, etc. - experiencing a sort of leadership crisis, in a moment when their public image is being questioned and their social status threatened. Is it, then, possible to visualize how our contemporary images of power may become transfigured, challenged and contorted? The dialogue between these two representations of Innocent X inspires questions about the representation and re-interpretation of authority and leadership and it aims at responding the question of What do images of leaders as depicted by portraiture contribute to our understanding of leading and leadership? This paper follows the analytical framework proposed by Guthey and Jackson (2005, 2008) concerning a 'visual genealogy' (Schroeder and Zwick, 2004) of images of leaders. The notion of establishing a 'genealogy' of representations of leadership draws upon the work of Michel Foucault, concerning the ways through which Western culture creates subjects and, most specifically, how images of leadership are created through portraiture and art. The interest in the Pope acknowledges the significance of his figure as leader of the Catholic Church, one of the most important institutions in European history; here, however, the intention is to establish a dialogue between Bacon's view on leadership in the figure of Innocent X, on the one hand, and on the other the original portrait by Velazquez, both seen in the context of contemporary discussions about leadership and charisma. Here, portraiture is approached as an aesthetic expression that can be used as a means of enquiring into certain aspects of leadership (Taylor and Hansen, 2005). Both perceptions coincided in their interpretation of leadership as focused on the charismatic individual; yet each of these two representations evidences a rupture, a questioning of this view. Velazquez, in a troppo vero (too real) depiction of the Pope, shows an efficient and cruel leader while offering his personal interpretation of the politics of his time. Bacon's interpretation goes further, by representing a powerful yet isolated leader, whose excessive individuality has produced a cage in which he remains trapped. Separated from his subjects, this view resembles the excessive attention that the individual is given when understanding leadership and its potential problems. This paper adds to the exploration of aesthetic expressions as a means of enquiring into organizational and social issues, for example, the case of leadership. It evidences the potentialities of considering specific artistic expressions, such as portraiture, as heuristic devices towards understanding some of the processes through which leadership is socially constructed, and the mechanisms promoting one notion or another of leadership in different historical periods.
机译:威权主义人物和领导人的形象启发了弗朗西斯·培根的许多画作。其中,他对维拉克斯克斯(Velazquez)的《无辜者之肖像X》(1650年)的诠释代表了揭示领导者内心复杂困境的一种典范。然而,尽管在维拉克斯奎兹的画像中,教皇显得富丽堂皇,安详而好奇,但培根在维拉克斯奎兹的《无辜十世教皇肖像》之后的研究似乎探索了他权威赋予的孤立。培根对这幅画的迷恋可能暗示着对当代组织神话的更大挑战-高层管理人员,商人,政治人物,首席执行官,银行家等-在公众形象受到质疑以及他们的当下正在经历某种领导力危机社会地位受到威胁。那么,是否有可能将我们当代的权力形象形象化,变形和挑战呢?这两种Innocent X表示形式之间的对话激发了有关权威和领导力的表示形式和重新解释的问题,其目的是回答以下问题:肖像画所描绘的领导者形象对我们对领导力和领导力的理解有何贡献?本文遵循了Guthey和Jackson(2005,2008)提出的关于领导者形象的“视觉家谱”(Schroeder和Zwick,2004)的分析框架。建立领导力代表的“家谱”的概念借鉴了米歇尔·福柯的著作,涉及西方文化创造主题的方式,最具体地说,是如何通过肖像画和艺术创造领导力的图像。对教皇的兴趣承认了他作为天主教堂领导人的重要性,天主教堂是欧洲历史上最重要的机构之一;但是,这里的目的是要在培根的无辜X人物的领导观点与贝拉克斯兹的原始肖像之间建立对话,两者都是在当代关于领导力和魅力的讨论中看到的。在这里,肖像画被视为一种美学表达方式,可以用作探究领导力某些方面的一种方式(Taylor and Hansen,2005)。两种看法都恰好在于他们对领导力的解释是针对魅力型个体的。然而,这两种表述均表明存在破裂,对此观点提出了质疑。委拉斯开兹(Velazquez)在对教皇的troppo vero(太真实)描绘中,展示了一个高效而残酷的领袖,同时提供了他对当时政治的个人解释。培根的解释更进一步,他代表了一位强大而又与世隔绝的领导者,他过分的个性造就了一个笼子,他被困在其中。这种观点与他的主题分开,类似于在理解领导力及其潜在问题时给予个人过多的关注。本文增加了对美学表达方式的探索,以此作为探究组织和社会问题(例如领导力案例)的一种手段。它证明了考虑将特定的艺术表现形式(例如肖像画)作为启发式手段来理解社会构建领导力的某些过程以及在不同历史时期促进一种或多种领导力的机制的潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号