首页> 外文期刊>The Leadership quarterly >Leadership succession in different types of organizations: What business and political successions may learn from each other
【24h】

Leadership succession in different types of organizations: What business and political successions may learn from each other

机译:不同类型的组织的领导连续:商业和政治继承可能会彼此学习

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We systematically review the recent impactful leadership succession literature in three types of organizations/ contexts, namely publicly-traded, privately-owned (mostly family businesses), and political organizations. We compare and contrast these literatures, and argue that business and political leadership succession researchers and practitioners can learn from each other. The purpose of the review is fourfold. First, to take stock of the existing leadership succession research in these three related literatures - that examine the same essential phenomenon - but that have evolved separately. Previous reviews have focused mostly on CEO succession (not the broader phenomenon of leadership succession) mainly in publicly-traded firms; and to our knowledge no (recent) comprehensive literature reviews on the important topics of privately-owned and political organization leadership succession exist yet. Second, to develop an overarching integrative conceptual framework (ICF) that structures the overall leadership succession literature and shows the potential areas of integration and difference among the three literatures. Third, to develop three organizational frameworks - one for each organization type - that review what we know and what we should know about leadership succession in each type. Fourth, to critically compare the ICF, the three organizational frameworks, and the three literatures to better understand the similarities and differences among these literatures. By doing so and using a multidisciplinary approach we aim to contribute to the field in the following ways. Firstly, we seek to synthesize the field of leadership succession to identify important research questions that are ripe for study in the near future in the business and political science disciplines. Secondly, we strive to uncover what succession researchers and practitioners across these disciplines may learn from each other.
机译:我们系统地审查最近有三种组织/上下文,即公开交易,私营(主要是家庭企业)和政治组织的影响。我们比较和对比这些文献,并争辩说,业务和政治领导层继承研究人员和从业者可以互相学习。审查的目的是四倍。首先,在这三个相关文献中的现有领导继承研究中的现有领导继承研究 - 检查相同的基本现象 - 但这已经分开进化。以前的评论主要集中在首席执行官继任(不是领导继承的更广泛的现象)主要是在公开交易公司;以及我们知识没有(最近)关于私营和政治组织领导力的重要议题的全面文学评论。其次,制定一个总体综合概念框架(ICF),这些概念框架(ICF)构建了整体领导层的演员,并展示了三个文献中的整合和差异的潜在领域。第三,开发三个组织框架 - 每个组织类型的组织框架 - 这审查了我们所知道的以及我们应该了解每种类型的领导力的事物。第四,要批判地比较ICF,三个组织框架,以及三个文献,以更好地了解这些文献之间的相似之处和差异。通过这样做并使用多学科方法,我们的目标是以以下方式为该领域做出贡献。首先,我们寻求综合领导地位继承领域,以确定在商业和政治学科的不久的将来成熟的重要研究问题。其次,我们努力揭示这些学科的继承研究人员和从业者可以彼此学习。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号