首页> 外文期刊>Law Library Journal >Pirating Fictions: Ownership and Creativity in Nineteenth-Century Popular Culture
【24h】

Pirating Fictions: Ownership and Creativity in Nineteenth-Century Popular Culture

机译:盗版小说:19世纪大众文化中的所有权和创造力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

1 There is a paradox in Gilbert and Sullivan's The Pirates of Penzance, and not just the one sung about early in Act II. Monica E Cohen notes that for a work designed to denounce the piratical unauthorized productions of HMS Pinafore, which robbed Gilbert and Sullivan of both royalty checks and artistic control of their work, the pirates on stage are uniquely charming. She expected that authors who suffered from literary pirates would depict their fictional nautical pirates in the worst possible light. However, as she surveyed Victorian literature, Cohen found nautical pirates celebrated as "collaborative storytellers and comedic entertainers, figures whose affective energies make a case against Romantic originality that emphasized individual intellectual ownership by endorsing a creativity that is appropriative, recombinative, collective, and pointedly theatrical" (p.2). In Pirating Fictions: Ownership and Creativity in Nineteenth-Century Popular Culture, Cohen explores the tension between an emerging legal order that provided greater protections for intellectual property and a culture that was collaborative and derivative.12 Before Cohen presents her introduction, she provides the reader an invaluable aid. Just as Jim's map in Treasure Island? provides a preview of the journey ahead, Cohen's chronology places in context the key literary and legal waypoints from the 1557 Royal Charter to the Worshipful Company of Stationers and Newspapers, all the way through to the United States joining the Berne Convention in 1989. Each of the book's eight chapters features a principal author: Daniel Defoe, Lord Byron, Walter Scott, James Fenimore Cooper, Charles Dickens, W.S. Gilbert and Arthur Sullivan, Robert Louis Stevenson, and J.M. Barrie.
机译:1吉尔伯特(Gilbert)和沙利文(Sullivan)的《彭赞斯海盗》(The Pirates of Penzance)中存在一个悖论,而不仅仅是第二幕初期的那种。莫妮卡·E·科恩(Monica E Cohen)指出,对于一部旨在谴责盗版HMS Pinafore的作品,抢劫了吉尔伯特(Gilbert)和沙利文(Sullivan)对其作品的版权和艺术控制力,舞台上的海盗是非常迷人的。她希望遭受文学海盗侵害的作者能够以最恶劣的姿态描绘他们的虚构航海海盗。但是,科恩在调查维多利亚时代的文学作品时,发现航海海盗被誉为“合作的讲故事者和喜剧演艺人员,这些人物的情感能量反对浪漫主义的原创性,通过认可具有专有性,重组性,集体性和创造性的创造力来强调个人的知识所有权。戏剧”(第2页)。在《盗版小说:十九世纪大众文化中的所有权和创造力》中,科恩探讨了为知识产权提供更大保护的新兴法律秩序与合作和衍生文化之间的张力。12科恩在介绍她的作品之前,先向读者介绍宝贵的帮助。就像吉姆在金银岛上的地图一样?提供了未来旅程的预览,科恩的编年史从1557年的《皇家宪章》到信纸和报纸的崇拜公司,一直到美国在1989年加入《伯尔尼公约》,一直是文学和法律上的主要观点。该书的八章介绍了主要作者:丹尼尔·迪福,拜伦勋爵,沃尔特·斯科特,詹姆斯·费尼莫尔·库珀,查尔斯·狄更斯,WS Gilbert和Arthur Sullivan,Robert Louis Stevenson和J.M. Barrie。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号