首页> 外文期刊>Lasers in Medical Science >Microtensile bond strength of resin composite to dentin treated with Er:YAG laser of bleached teeth
【24h】

Microtensile bond strength of resin composite to dentin treated with Er:YAG laser of bleached teeth

机译:用Er:YAG激光治疗漂白牙齿对树脂复合材料与牙本质的微拉伸强度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of Er:YAG laser (λ = 2.94 μm) on microtensile bond strength (μTBS) and superficial morphology of bovine dentin bleached with 16% carbamide peroxide. Forty bovine teeth blocks (7 × 3 × 3 mm3) were randomly assigned to four groups: G1- bleaching and Er:YAG irradiation with energy density of 25.56 J/cm2 (focused mode); G2 - bleaching; G3 - no-bleaching and Er:YAG irradiation (25.56 J/cm2); G4 - control, non-treated. G1 and G2 were bleached with 16% carbamide peroxide for 6 h during 21 days. Afterwards, all blocks were abraded with 320 to 600-grit abrasive papers to obtain flat standardized dentin surfaces. G1 and G3 were Er:YAG irradiated. Blocks were immediately restored with 4-mm-high composite resin (Adper Single Bond 2, Z-250-3 M/ESPE). After 24 h, the restored blocks (n = 9) were serially sectioned and trimmed to an hour-glass shape of approximately 1 mm2 at the bonded interface area, and tested in tension in a universal testing machine (1 mm/ min). Failure mode was determined at a magnification of 100× using a stereomicroscope. One block of each group was selected for scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis. μTBS data was analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey test (α = 0.05). Mean bond strengths (SD) in MPa were: G1- 32.7 (5.9)A; G2- 31.1 (6.3)A; G3- 25.2 (8.3)B; G4- 36.7 (9.9).A Groups with different uppercase letters were significantly different from each other (p .05). Enamel bleaching procedure did not affect μTBS values for dentin adhesion. Er:YAG laser irradiation with 25.56 J/cm2 prior to adhesive procedure of bleached teeth did not affect μTBS at dentin and promoted a dentin surface with no smear layer and opened dentin tubules observed under SEM. On the other hand, Er:YAG laser irradiation prior to adhesive procedure of non-bleached surface impaired μTBS compared to the control group.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估Er:YAG激光(λ= 2.94μm)对用16%过氧化尿素漂白的牛牙本质的微拉伸强度(μTBS)和表面形态的影响。将40个牛牙块(7×3×3 mm3 )随机分为四组:G1-漂白和Er:YAG辐射,能量密度为25.56 J / cm2 (聚焦模式); G2-漂白; G3-无漂白和Er:YAG辐照(2​​5.56 J / cm2 ); G4-对照,未处理。在21天内,将G1和G2用16%的过氧化脲漂白6小时。然后,将所有砖块用320到600砂砾的砂纸磨擦,以获得平坦的标准化牙本质表面。对G1和G3进行Er:YAG照射。立即用4毫米高的复合树脂(Adper Single Bond 2,Z-250-3 M / ESPE)修复砌块。 24小时后,将已修复的砖块(n = 9)连续切片,并在粘合的界面区域修整为大约1 mm2 的沙漏形状,并在通用测试仪(1 mm /分钟)。使用立体显微镜以100倍的放大倍数确定失效模式。每组选择一块进行扫描电子显微镜(SEM)分析。 μTBS数据通过双向方差分析和Tukey检验进行分析(α= 0.05)。以MPa计的平均粘结强度(SD)为:G1-32.7(5.9)A ; G2- 31.1(6.3)A ; G3- 25.2(8.3)B ; G4- 36.7(9.9).A 具有不同大写字母的组之间存在显着差异(p <.05)。牙釉质漂白程序不影响牙本质粘附的μTBS值。 Er:YAG激光在漂白牙齿粘连之前先用25.56 J / cm2 照射对牙本质处的μTBS没有影响,并且促进了牙本质表面无涂片层和在SEM下观察到的开放性牙本质小管。另一方面,与对照组相比,在未漂白表面受损的μTBS的粘合程序之前进行Er:YAG激光照射。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号