首页> 外文期刊>Language and education >Literacies: social, cultural and historical perspectives
【24h】

Literacies: social, cultural and historical perspectives

机译:文学:社会,文化和历史观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Literacy education remains contentious in many parts of the world. Questions such as 'What is literacy?', 'What is literacy in the increasingly technologically mediated New Times?', ' How do teachers teach literacy in the classrooms?',' How do we conduct research in literacy and new literacies?' and 'How do we prepare literacy teachers and literacy researchers?' have all been debated for quite some time (Gee 2008; Snyder 2008). This series of debates has not only taken place among literacy researchers and in language policy contexts, but also impacted on the everyday work of literacy teachers. For the past 25 years or so, Colin Lankshear and Michele Knobel, both individually and collaboratively, have been actively participating in, and contributing to, the theorization and research into these questions. Their most recent book Literacies: Social, Cultural and Historical Perspectives collects 16 essays from their much longer list of publications and records some of the highlights of their significant contributions over a period of a quarter-century.
机译:扫盲教育在世界许多地方仍然存在争议。诸如“什么是扫盲?”,“在技术日益中介的新时代,什么是扫盲?”,“教师如何在课堂上教授扫盲?”,“我们如何进行扫盲和新扫盲研究”等问题。和“我们如何准备扫盲教师和扫盲研究人员?”争论已经有一段时间了(Gee 2008; Snyder 2008)。这一系列辩论不仅在扫盲研究人员之间以及在语言政策背景下进行,而且还影响了扫盲教师的日常工作。在过去的25年左右的时间里,Colin Lankshear和Michele Knobel单独或合作地一直积极参与并为这些问题的理论化和研究做出贡献。他们的最新著作《文学:社会,文化和历史观点》从其更长的出版物列表中收集了16篇论文,并记录了它们在25年间的重要贡献的一些亮点。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Language and education》 |2013年第1期|90-93|共4页
  • 作者

    Libo Guo;

  • 作者单位

    National Institute of Education Nanyang Technological University, Singapore;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号