首页> 外文期刊>Labor History >The 'revolution now in progress': social economics and the labor question
【24h】

The 'revolution now in progress': social economics and the labor question

机译:“正在进行的革命”:社会经济学和劳动问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article revisits postbellum efforts to address the labor question and social reform through the emerging field of economics, in particular through social economics. Social economics, now usually known as institutional economics, offered on alternative path for the field of economics, one which rejected sharp distinction between practical or material studies and social-theoretical inquiries. This broad approach to economics in particular and the social sciences more generally shaped the emerging field of labor history. Labor historians have long been critical of early labor histories, particularly stressing their narrow focus on unions and economic goals. A re-examination of social economics, and the contingent language of institutionalism, however, suggests that social economics can continue to offer labor historians a useful model, one that stressed the position of labor history within broader examinations of political economy.
机译:本文回顾了战后的努力,以通过新兴的经济学领域,特别是通过社会经济学来解决劳动问题和社会改革。社会经济学,现在通常被称为制度经济学,为经济学领域提供了另一条道路,它拒绝了实践研究或物质研究与社会理论探究之间的明显区别。特别是对经济学,尤其是社会科学的广泛采用,形成了新兴的劳动史领域。劳工历史学家长期以来一直批评早期的劳工历史,尤其是强调他们对工会和经济目标的狭narrow关注。然而,对社会经济学的重新审视和制度主义的特有语言表明,社会经济学可以继续为劳动史学家提供一种有用的模型,该模型强调了劳动历史在更广泛的政治经济学研究中的地位。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Labor History》 |2009年第1期|1-17|共17页
  • 作者

    Rosanne Currarino;

  • 作者单位

    Queen's University, Canada;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:54:44

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号