...
首页> 外文期刊>Labor History >Americanism and anti-communism: the UAW and repressive liberalism before the red scare
【24h】

Americanism and anti-communism: the UAW and repressive liberalism before the red scare

机译:美国主义与反共产主义:红色恐惧之前的UAW和压制性自由主义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The relationship between Communism and Americanism during the Popular Front period is now largely perceived as a positive one. By promoting the idea that Communism was an extension of specifically American political traditions, the argument runs, Communists were able to advance their participation in the unions and in a left-oriented cultural-political alliance with broad popular appeal. Against this perspective, this article highlights the repressive significance of liberal nationalism as a resource for the narrowing of political culture in the New Deal labor movement. In particular, the analysis focuses on the importance of Americanism to attacks by the Reuther caucus on the Communist Party in the United Automobile Workers (UAW) from the end of the 1930s through the war. Such factional politics are significant both as a reflection of more general developments in the Congress of Industrial Organizations and because of the UAW's centrality to the political trajectory of the labor movement. More broadly, this history reveals how a liberal anti-Communism embraced the demonizing politics typically associated with the post-war red scare, linking New Deal political culture to a long tradition of countersubversive discourse in America.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0023656X.2012.731771
机译:人民阵线时期的共产主义与美国主义之间的关系现在基本上被认为是积极的。该论点通过提倡共产主义是特定的美国政治传统的延伸的思想而得以实现,共产主义者得以促进他们对工会和左倾文化政治联盟的参与,并具有广泛的公众吸引力。在这种观点下,本文强调了自由民族主义作为新政劳工运动中缩小政治文化的资源的压制性意义。从1930年代末到整个战争期间,分析尤其着重于美国主义对鲁特·休特小组对联合汽车工人党(UAW)共产党的袭击的重要性。这样的派系政治意义重大,既反映了工业组织代表大会上更普遍的发展,也归功于UAW在工人运动的政治轨迹中的中心地位。更广泛地说,这段历史揭示了自由主义的反共主义如何接受通常与战后红色恐慌有关的妖魔化政治,将新政政治文化与美国悠久的反颠覆话语传统联系起来。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand:“ Taylor&Francis Online”,service_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0023656X.2012.731771

著录项

  • 来源
    《Labor History 》 |2012年第4期| p.495-515| 共21页
  • 作者

    Charles Williamsa*;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号