首页> 外文期刊>Journal of world trade >Taking Justice into Your Own Hand: The TBI Mechanism in China
【24h】

Taking Justice into Your Own Hand: The TBI Mechanism in China

机译:伸张正义:中国的贸易壁垒机制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To protect the trade interests of their firms in foreign markets, several countries have established various institutional arrangements. For example, the United States has the section 301 procedure, while the EU has the Trade Barrier Regulation (TBR). Learning from their experiences, China also established its own Foreign Trade Barrier Investigation (TBI) mechanism in 2002. This article starts with a discussion on the background for its establishment as well as the substantive and procedural requirements for investigations under TBI. In the next part, the article discusses how TBI has worked in practice by reviewing the Japan -Quantitative Restrictions on Laver case (hereinafter 'Japan-Laver case'), the only case that has ever been brought under the mechanism. Drawing from the lessons learnt from the Japan-Laver case, the article then offers suggestions on how the TBI might be improved in the future. The article concludes with observations on the possible implications of the TBI on China's trade partners and the multilateral trading system as a whole.
机译:为了保护公司在国外市场的贸易利益,一些国家已经建立了各种制度安排。例如,美国具有301条程序,而欧盟具有《贸易壁垒条例》(TBR)。从他们的经验中吸取教训,中国还在2002年建立了自己的对外贸易壁垒调查(TBI)机制。本文首先讨论了其成立的背景以及根据TBI进行调查的实质性和程序性要求。在下一部分中,文章将通过回顾日本-对紫菜的量化限制案(以下简称“日本-紫菜案”)来探讨TBI在实践中的工作方式,这是该机制中唯一涉及的案件。文章借鉴了日本拉弗案的经验教训,然后就未来如何改进TBI提出了建议。本文最后就贸易壁垒对中国贸易伙伴和整个多边贸易体系可能产生的影响发表了看法。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of world trade》 |2010年第3期|P.633-659|共27页
  • 作者

    Henry Gao;

  • 作者单位

    School of Law, Singapore Management University;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号