首页> 外文期刊>Journal of World Investment & Trade; Law, Economics, Politics >Anti-Arbitration Injunctions in Cases Involving Investor-State Arbitration: British Caribbean Bank Ltd. v. The Government of Belize
【24h】

Anti-Arbitration Injunctions in Cases Involving Investor-State Arbitration: British Caribbean Bank Ltd. v. The Government of Belize

机译:涉及投资人与国家/地区仲裁的案件中的反仲裁禁令:British Caribbean Bank Ltd.诉伯利兹政府

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Over the last few years, the international legal community has become increasingly interested in anti-arbitration injunctions, which are analogous to anti-suit injunctions except that the former prohibits the initiation or continuation of an arbitration while the latter focuses on judicial actions. At this point, very few courts have actually issued an injunction of this type. Nevertheless, a number of commentators have expressed concern about these mechanisms, since they can wreak havoc with contractual or treaty-based expectations about how a particular dispute is to be resolved. Indeed, some scholars and practitioners would prefer that these sorts of injunctions be made universally unavailable. However, other people believe that there are times when a court may enjoin arbitral procedures without damaging any of the core principles of arbitration law and practice.
机译:在过去的几年中,国际法律界对反仲裁禁令越来越感兴趣,该禁令类似于反诉讼禁令,只不过前者禁止启动或继续进行仲裁,而后者则着重于司法行动。在这一点上,实际上很少有法院发布这种禁令。但是,许多评论员对这些机制表示了担忧,因为它们可能严重破坏合同或基于条约的解决特定争议的期望。确实,一些学者和实践者希望将这类禁止令普遍禁止使用。但是,其他人则认为,有时候法院可以在不损害仲裁法律和实践的任何核心原则的情况下禁止仲裁程序。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号