首页> 外文期刊>Journal of world business >Talent Management and HRM in Multinational companies in Beijing: Definitions, differences and drivers
【24h】

Talent Management and HRM in Multinational companies in Beijing: Definitions, differences and drivers

机译:北京跨国公司的人才管理和人力资源管理:定义,差异和驱动因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Talent Management (TM) has attracted increasing attention from academics and practitioners in recent years, but there are many gaps and omissions left for further theoretical and empirical development. One line of debate has been whether TM is merely a re-packaging of what already exists, not being distinct from traditional HRM practices or disciplines. The paper has three main components: (ⅰ)a review of how 'Talent' and TM has been conceptualised in the literature and the outline of a framework we have derived therefrom which identifies four main perspectives on TM: exclusive-people; exclusive-position; inclusive-people; social capital; (ⅱ) the presentation and analysis of our research findings relating to TM perspectives and practices in seven multinational corporations (MNCs) in Beijing; (ⅲ) a concluding discussion which compares and contrasts our findings with the extant literature and our framework. Six of the companies had adopted 'exclusive' perspectives, seeing TM as 'integrated, selective' HRM. For some, this involved an 'exclusive-people' focus on certain groups of high-performing' or 'high-potential' people, whilst for others it meant an 'exclusive-position' focus on certain 'key' positions in the organization. Just one organization had adopted an 'inclusive-people' approach. Two of the companies emphasized 'organizationally focussed competence development', concentrating upon smooth talent flows and development, and moving towards a 'social capital' perspective which took cognizance of networks, contexts and relationships as well as human capital. The implications of our findings for research and practice are outlined.
机译:近年来,人才管理(TM)引起了学术界和从业者的越来越多的关注,但是在理论和经验上的进一步发展还存在许多空白和遗漏。争论的焦点之一是TM是否仅是对已经存在的东西的重新包装,与传统的HRM实践或学科没有区别。本文包括三个主要部分:(ⅰ)回顾文献中“人才”和“商标”的概念以及我们从中得出的框架概述,该框架确定了“商标”的四个主要观点:排他性人;独占包容性人民社会资本; (ⅱ)对我们在北京的7家跨国公司(TMC)中与TM观点和实践有关的研究结果的介绍和分析; (ⅲ)总结性讨论,将我们的发现与现有文献和我们的框架进行比较和对比。其中六家公司采用了“独占”观点,将TM视为“集成的,选择性的” HRM。对于某些人而言,这涉及“排他性”关注某些高绩效或“高潜力”人群,而对另一些人而言,这意味着“排他性”关注该组织中某些“关键”职位。只有一个组织采用了“包容性”方法。其中两家公司强调“以组织为中心的能力发展”,侧重于顺畅的人才流动和发展,并朝着“社会资本”的观点发展,这种观点需要网络,背景,关系和人力资本的认知。概述了我们的发现对研究和实践的意义。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of world business》 |2010年第2期|179-189|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Faculty of Business and Law Leeds Business School, Rose Bowl, Civic Quarter, Leeds Metropolitan University, Portland Crescent, Leeds LS1 3HB, UK;

    Belzona Polymerics Ltd., Claro Road, Harrogate, North Yorkshire HG1 4AY, UK;

    Centre for Leadership and Organizational Change, Teesside University Business School, University of Teesside, Borough Road, Middlesbrough, Tees Valley TS1 3BA, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    talent management; HRM; China; Beijing; multinational companies;

    机译:人才管理;人力资源管理;中国;北京;跨国公司;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号