...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management >Hybrid Linear and Nonlinear Programming Model for Hydropower Reservoir Optimization
【24h】

Hybrid Linear and Nonlinear Programming Model for Hydropower Reservoir Optimization

机译:水电站储层优化的混合线性和非线性规划模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Linear and nonlinear optimization models are common in hydropower reservoir modeling to aid system operators and planners. Different modeling techniques have their advantages and shortcomings. Linear optimization models are faster but less accurate, and nonlinear models are slower with better system representation. A hybrid linear and nonlinear hydropower energy reservoir optimization (HERO) model is introduced, where a hybrid optimization model sequentially solves the overall nonlinear hydropower optimization problem first with a faster-running linear programming (LP) approximation to improve an initial solution for a nonlinear programming (NLP) solution to significantly reduce NLP iterations and run time. The hybrid model is applied to six hydropower plants of California, with capacities of 13.5 to 714 MW. LP and NLP decisions are compared, and run time benchmarks of the LP, NLP, and hybrid LP-NLP models with different numbers of decision variables are presented. The hybrid model reduces the NLP run time by 79% to 88%, depending on model size, but still requires much more run time than the LP solution. For short-term operations with good inflow and energy price forecasts, where accuracy matters more and uncertainties are modest, the hybrid LP-NLP model has advantages. For long-term hydropower planning and management with many more decision variables and greater inflow uncertainty, the LP model, with its greater speed and sensitivity analysis, or stochastic models, representing some uncertainties, will often be preferred.
机译:线性和非线性优化模型常见于水电站模型,以辅助系统运营商和规划者。不同的建模技术具有它们的优点和缺点。线性优化模型更快但更准确,非线性型号较慢,系统表示更好。介绍了混合线性和非线性水电能量储层(英雄)模型,其中混合优化模型首先顺序地解决了整体非线性水电优化问题,以更快运行的线性编程(LP)近似,以改善非线性编程的初始解决方案(NLP)解决方案以显着减少NLP迭代和运行时间。混合模型适用于加利福尼亚六种水电站,容量为13.5至714兆瓦。比较LP和NLP决定,并呈现了LP,NLP和Hybrid LP-NLP模型的运行时间基准,具有不同数量的决策变量。混合模型将NLP运行时间降低79%至88%,具体取决于型号大小,但仍需要比LP解决方案更高的运行时间。对于具有良好流入和能源价格预测的短期运营,在准确性越来越重要的情况下,杂交LP-NLP模型具有优势。对于长期水电规划和管理具有更多的决策变量和更大的流入不确定性,LP模型,具有较大的速度和灵敏度分析,或表示一些不确定性的随机模型通常是优选的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号