...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vocational behavior >Cross-cultural validation of Holland's interest structure in Chinese population
【24h】

Cross-cultural validation of Holland's interest structure in Chinese population

机译:荷兰对中国人口利益结构的跨文化验证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This study evaluated Holland's (1973, 1985, 1997) structural hypotheses—circular order and circumplex—in two populations in China at both the subtest (Activities, Competencies, Occupational Preferences, and Self-ratings on Abilities) and the entire test levels of the Self-Directed Search (SDS; Holland, 1994). Confirmatory factor analyses suggested that the circumplex model was generally not supported for Chinese people. Randomization tests of hypothesized order relations suggested that the circular order model fit both Mainland China and Hong Kong samples at the Activities and Occupational Preferences sub tests. Randomization tests of differences in fit indicated that there was generally no cultural or gender differences in terms of model fit. Theoretical and practical implications were discussed.
机译:这项研究在子测验(活动,能力,职业偏好和能力自我评估)以及整个测验水平下,评估了中国两个人群中荷兰人(1973、1985、1997)的结构假设-循环顺序和外接。自我导向搜索(SDS; Holland,1994)。验证性因素分析表明,中国人通常不支持外接模型。假设的订单关系的随机检验表明,在“活动和职业偏好”子检验中,循环订单模型适合中国大陆和香港的样本。拟合优度的随机检验表明,就模型拟合而言,通常没有文化或性别差异。讨论了理论和实践意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号