首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Victorian Culture >‘One single ivory cell’: Oscar Wilde and the Brain
【24h】

‘One single ivory cell’: Oscar Wilde and the Brain

机译:“一个象牙细胞”:奥斯卡·王尔德与大脑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper considers Oscar Wilde's ongoing interest in the image of a single brain cell as a souvenir of human autonomy in a world of matter. Taking a long view of Wilde's career that demonstrates the relevance to his literary work of his college interests in physiology and philosophy, this paper shows how Wilde's socialism can be explained by his uniquely aesthetic take on the brain. For many late Victorians brain science threatened both the autonomy of human action and the legitimacy of beauty because it had the potential to invalidate conscious experience, but writers whose work Wilde knew, like Ernst Haeckel, W.K. Clifford and John Tyndall, apply aesthetic vocabularies to their own discussions of cells. Their theories illuminate Wilde's representation of the cell as an aesthetic object. Wilde's art collaborates with science to reject action, as action is conventionally understood, without relinquishing beauty as his ultimate value. His discovery of beauty in matter that is beyond the pale of human experience, yet intimately and strangely constitutive of our experience, directs the senses to a new field of experience that values the molecular life the species holds in common, in which individuals and their actions matter less to the possibility of social change than does the necessity of pleasure.View full textDownload full textKeywordsOscar Wilde, The Picture of Dorian Gray , Oxford Notebooks, science, aestheticism, socialismRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13555502.2011.632074
机译:本文认为,奥斯卡·王尔德(Oscar Wilde)对单个脑细胞图像作为物质世界中人类自治纪念品的持续兴趣。本文以王尔德的职业生涯的长远观点来证明其生理学和哲学方面的大学兴趣与其文学作品的相关性,本文显示了王尔德的社会主义如何用他独特的大脑美学来解释。对于许多维多利亚时代晚期的人来说,脑科学既威胁着人类行为的自主权,也威胁着美的合法性,因为它有可能使意识体验无效。但是,王尔德知道其著作的作家,例如英国的恩斯特·海克尔(Ernst Haeckel)。 Clifford和John Tyndall将美学词汇运用到他们对细胞的讨论中。他们的理论阐明了王尔德将细胞作为美学对象的表现。王尔德的艺术与科学合作,拒绝行动,因为行动通常被理解为不放弃美作为他的终极价值。他对物质的美发现超越了人类的经验,但却对我们的经验产生了亲密而奇怪的构成,将这些感官引向了一个新的经验领域,该领域重视物种共有的分子生命,其中个体及其行为与社会变革的可能性相比,对社会变化的关注要比对快乐的重要性要小。查看全文下载全文关键词::“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,pubid:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13555502.2011.632074

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号