首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Urban Economics >Does the market value value-added? Evidence from housing prices after a public release of school and teacher value-added
【24h】

Does the market value value-added? Evidence from housing prices after a public release of school and teacher value-added

机译:市场增值了吗?公开发布学校和教师增值后的房价证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Value-added data have become an increasingly common evaluation tool for schools and teachers. Many school districts have begun to adopt these methods and have released results publicly. In this paper, we use the unique public release of value-added data in Los Angeles to identify how this measure of school quality is capitalized into housing prices. Via difference-in-differences, we find no evidence of a response to either school or teacher value-added rank, even though school-zone boundary fixed-effects estimates indicate that test score levels are capitalized into home prices. Given ample evidence that this information was new to residents, widely dispersed, and easily available, our results suggest that people did not significantly value it on the margin. This has implications for the effectiveness of providing value-added information as a tool to help parents choose schools. (c) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:增值数据已成为学校和教师越来越普遍的评估工具。许多学区已开始采用这些方法,并已公开发布结果。在本文中,我们使用洛杉矶公开发行的增值数据来确定如何将衡量学校质量的方法转化为房价。通过差异,我们发现没有证据表明对学校或教师的增值等级有反应,即使学区边界固定效应估计表明考试分数水平已被资本化为房价。如果有足够的证据表明此信息对于居民来说是新的,分散的且易于获取,则我们的结果表明人们并没有对它的边际价值进行明显评估。这对提供增值信息作为帮助父母选择学校的工具的有效性产生了影响。 (c)2015 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号