首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Urban Economics >Putting America to work, where? Evidence on the effectiveness of infrastructure construction as a locally targeted employment policy
【24h】

Putting America to work, where? Evidence on the effectiveness of infrastructure construction as a locally targeted employment policy

机译:让美国工作在哪里?关于基础设施建设作为针对当地的就业政策的有效性的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Is infrastructure construction an effective way to boost employment in distressed local labor markets? Using new geographically detailed data on highway construction that was funded bythe American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, I study how road construction projects affect local employment growth. The method for allocating funds across space facilitates a plausible selection-on-observables strategy. I find that highway funding impacted construction employment at the county level: A dollar of additional Recovery Act spending on local construction increased local construction payrolls by thirty cents during the five years after the Act's passage. The magnitude of this effect matches the national labor share of construction revenues, suggesting that targeted spending did not crowd out other local construction. These effects are most pronounced in counties with smaller populations and smaller shares of residents that commute to outside counties for work. However, when testing for general equilibrium effects on local employment and payroll aggregates, I find effects close to zero, with very wide confidence intervals across all specifications. Although the Recovery Act was an intervention significant enough to have a sizable impact on the construction sector in counties with low mobility, these findings suggest that the local variation in highway spending was too small relative to baseline regional volatility to detect a "local multiplier" effect impacting jobs outside of construction.
机译:基础设施建设是否是在陷入困境的当地劳动力市场中增加就业的有效途径?我使用《美国复苏与再投资法案》(American Recovery and Reinvestment Act)资助的有关公路建设的新地理详细数据,研究了公路建设项目如何影响当地就业增长。用于跨空间分配资金的方法促进了一种合理的可观察选择策略。我发现高速公路资金影响了县一级的建筑业就业:《法案》通过后的五年内,《恢复法》在当地建筑上的额外支出增加了30美分,这是该法案通过后的结果。这种影响的程度与建筑收入在全国劳动力中的份额相符,这表明目标支出并未挤占其他地方建筑。这些影响在人口较少,居民较少且通勤到外部县工作的县中最为明显。但是,在测试对本地就业和工资总额的总体均衡影响时,我发现效果接近于零,并且所有规格的置信区间都非常大。尽管《恢复法案》是一项重大干预措施,足以对流动性低的县的建筑行业产生巨大影响,但这些发现表明,公路支出的本地变化相对于基准区域波动性而言太小,无法检测到“本地乘数”。影响施工以外的工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号