首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Urban Design >Landscape Urbanism and New Urbanism: A View of the Debate
【24h】

Landscape Urbanism and New Urbanism: A View of the Debate

机译:景观都市主义与新都市主义:争论的视角

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Matthew Heins' (2015) effort to find common ground between Landscape Urbanism and New Urbanism is a worthy project. We should encourage constructive debates between today's competing approaches to urban design, hopefully based on evidence, logic and theoretical coherence. However, Heins is more optimistic than this author. So far, Landscape Urbanism falls far short of launching a "disciplinary realignment in which landscape supplants architecture's historical role as the basic building block of urban design" (Waldheim 2006, 37). It suffers from the same practical and theoretical problems as neomodern architecture, with which it shares many family resemblances.
机译:马修·海因斯(Matthew Heins,2015)试图在景观都市主义和新都市主义之间寻找共同点是一项值得开展的项目。我们应该鼓励在当今竞争激烈的城市设计方法之间进行建设性辩论,希望基于证据,逻辑和理论一致性。但是,海因斯比这个作者更乐观。到目前为止,景观都市主义还远远没有发起“学科重组,景观取代了建筑作为城市设计基本要素的历史角色”(Waldheim 2006,37)。它遭受与新现代建筑相同的实践和理论问题,与之有着许多家庭相似之处。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Urban Design》 |2015年第3期|303-307|共5页
  • 作者

    CLIFF ELLIS;

  • 作者单位

    Program in City and Regional Planning, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:24:31

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号