首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of urban and regional research >Critical Urban Theory versus Critical Urban Studies: A Review Debate
【24h】

Critical Urban Theory versus Critical Urban Studies: A Review Debate

机译:批判性城市理论与批判性城市研究:评论辩论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Critical urban theory and critical urban studies form the subject of two recent edited collections on approaches to the analysis and transformation of the contemporary capitalist city. In an exchange of commentaries by the respective editors and contributors, the introduction explains the genesis of each book and previews some of the key observations. Peter Marcuse then offers his assessment of Critical Urban Studies: New Directions, which is reciprocated by a commentary on Cities for People, Not for Profit: Critical Urban Theory and the Right to the City by Jonathan Davies, David Imbroscio and Warren Magnusson.
机译:批判性城市理论和批判性城市研究形成了两个最近编辑的关于当代资本主义城市分析和转型方法的文献集。在各自编辑和撰稿人的评论交流中,引言解释了每本书的成因并预览了一些主要观察结果。彼得·马尔库塞(Peter Marcuse)随后对乔纳森·戴维斯(Jonathan Davies),戴维·英布罗西奥(David Imbroscio)和沃伦·马格努森(Warren Magnusson)的《为人民而不是为营利的城市:批判性城市理论和城市权》的评论作了回应,他对《关键城市研究:新方向》进行了评估。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Department of Urban Planning, Columbia University, Avery Hall Broadway and 116 Street, New York, NY 10027, USA;

    Department of Political Science, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky 40292, USA;

    Department of Politics, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK;

    Faculty of Business and Law, De Montfort University, The Gateway, Leicester LE1 9BH, UK;

    Department of Political Science, University of Victoria, P.O. Box 3060, Victoria, British Columbia V8W 3R4, Canada;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:26:49

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号