...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Transportation Engineering >Repeatability in Crack Data Collection on Flexible Pavements: Comparison between Surveys Using Video Cameras, Laser Cameras, and a Simplified Manual Survey
【24h】

Repeatability in Crack Data Collection on Flexible Pavements: Comparison between Surveys Using Video Cameras, Laser Cameras, and a Simplified Manual Survey

机译:柔性路面裂缝数据收集中的可重复性:使用摄像机,激光摄像机和简化的手动测量进行的测量之间的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Crack data can be collected using manual or automatic surveys. Traditionally, manual methods are used, and they are still the most common. Changing into automatic systems will enhance the efficiency of data collection as well as the objectivity. In this study the repeatability of an automatic crack data collection system using video images was evaluated. Ten repetitive measurements were made on a 10-km-long road section. Cracking was measured using six laser cameras attached to the same vehicle. The results from the two methods were compared. Simultaneously, a simplified manual windshield survey was conducted by three different persons, and the repeatability obtained was used for comparison with the repeatability established using the image and laser method, respectively. The correlation between repeated measurements using the two automatic systems was high, while the repeatability for the manual, subjective method was low. Suitable measures for crack characterization are discussed.
机译:裂纹数据可以使用手动或自动测量来收集。传统上,使用手动方法,但仍然是最常见的方法。改用自动系统将提高数据收集的效率和客观性。在这项研究中,评估了使用视频图像的自动裂纹数据收集系统的可重复性。在10公里长的路段上进行了十次重复测量。使用安装在同一车辆上的六个激光摄像机测量开裂。比较了两种方法的结果。同时,由三个不同的人进行了简化的手动挡风玻璃测量,并将获得的可重复性用于分别与使用图像和激光方法建立的可重复性进行比较。使用两个自动系统的重复测量之间的相关性很高,而手动,主观方法的可重复性却很低。讨论了裂纹表征的适当措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号