...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Transportation Engineering >Comparison of Clustering Methods for Road Group Identification in FHWA Traffic Monitoring Approach: Effects on AADT Estimates
【24h】

Comparison of Clustering Methods for Road Group Identification in FHWA Traffic Monitoring Approach: Effects on AADT Estimates

机译:FHWA交通监控方法中用于道路组识别的聚类方法的比较:对AADT估算的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Defining road groups is the first step in the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) factor approach procedure for annual average daily traffic (AADT) estimation and is one of the main sources of errors in AADT estimates. This paper focuses on a comparative analysis of cluster analysis methods to identify road groups with similar traffic patterns according to different combinations of seasonal adjustment factors calculated for passenger vehicles and trucks. The aim is to highlight the differences among methods and input variables in the AADT estimation process, optimizing information commonly available to analysts. The analysis made use of traffic data from 50 automatic traffic recorder (ATR) sites in the Province of Venice, Italy. The estimation accuracy of the clustering methods was assessed and compared by considering the values of mean absolute percent error in AADT estimates. The performance of clustering methods was found to differ, depending on data sets and traffic patterns. Particularly significant for the accuracy of AADT estimates was the choice to use seasonal adjustment factors disaggregated by vehicle type as input variables.
机译:定义道路组是美国联邦公路管理局(FHWA)因子方法程序中年度平均每日交通量(AADT)估算的第一步,也是AADT估算错误的主要来源之一。本文着重进行聚类分析方法的比较分析,以根据为乘用车和卡车计算的季节性调整因子的不同组合来识别交通模式相似的道路组。目的是强调AADT估计过程中方法和输入变量之间的差异,从而优化分析人员常用的信息。分析利用了来自意大利威尼斯省的50个自动行车记录仪(ATR)站点的交通数据。通过考虑AADT估计中的平均绝对百分比误差值来评估和比较聚类方法的估计准确性。发现聚类方法的性能有所不同,具体取决于数据集和流量模式。对于AADT估算的准确性特别重要的是选择使用按车辆类型分类的季节性调整因子作为输入变量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号