首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Transportation Engineering >Discrete Choice Models for Gap Acceptance at Urban Expressway Merge Sections Considering Safety, Road Geometry, and Traffic Conditions
【24h】

Discrete Choice Models for Gap Acceptance at Urban Expressway Merge Sections Considering Safety, Road Geometry, and Traffic Conditions

机译:考虑安全性,道路几何形状和交通状况的城市高速公路合并段间隙接受的离散选择模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A number of discrete choice models, including a multinomial logit model (MNL), a nested logit model (NL), and a latent choice set model (LCS), are applied to the representation of gap acceptance by merging vehicles (MVs) on urban expressways and their results are compared. The results show that all models give consistent signs to the estimated parameters. It is evident that the LCS model is capable of representing gap acceptance and allows exploration of the latent choice made by MVs. Comparison of the models shows that LCS is superior to the traditional MNL and NL models in terms of goodness of fit and provides a more realistic simulation of MV behavior. The effects of geometry and traffic conditions are fully considered in this study, and they are found to significantly influence the choices made by MVs. A longer acceleration lane may provide a relatively larger gap for MVs and, therefore, motivate them to accept the gap. With respect to traffic conditions, an MV tends to reject a gap under low (<20 vehicles/km/lane) or high density (> 40 vehicles/km/lane) conditions. However, gap acceptance is more likely when the density is from 20 to 40 vehicles/km/lane. With regard to safety, the concept of time to collision (TTC)is adopted to capture the reactions of MVs to mainline vehicles (MLVs). Both leading and following TTCs (between the MVand the leading/following MLV, respectively) are implemented in the models. Analyses indicate that the TTC thresholds for an MV to reject or accept a gap are 5 and 6 s for the leading and the following TTC, respectively. (C) 2017 American Society of Civil Engineers.
机译:许多离散选择模型,包括多项式对数模型(MNL),嵌套对数模型(NL)和潜在选择集模型(LCS),都用于通过合并城市上的车辆(MV)来表示间隙接受比较高速公路及其结果。结果表明,所有模型都为估计的参数提供了一致的符号。显然,LCS模型能够代表间隙接受并允许探索MV做出的潜在选择。模型的比较表明,在拟合优度方面,LCS优于传统的MNL和NL模型,并提供了更真实的MV行为模拟。在这项研究中充分考虑了几何形状和交通条件的影响,发现它们会显着影响MV的选择。较长的加速车道可能会为MV提供相对较大的间隙,并因此激励它们接受该间隙。关于交通状况,在低(<20辆车/公里/车道)或高密度(> 40辆车/公里/车道)条件下,MV倾向于拒绝间隙。但是,当密度为20到40辆/公里/车道时,更容易接受间隙。在安全性方面,采用了碰撞时间(TTC)的概念来捕获中型车辆对主干车辆(MLV)的反应。模型中同时实现了前导和后继TTC(分别位于MV和前导/后继MLV之间)。分析表明,MV拒绝或接受间隙的TTC阈值对于前导和后继TTC分别为5 s和6 s。 (C)2017年美国土木工程师学会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号