首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Transport Geography >An optimization approach for equitable bicycle share station siting
【24h】

An optimization approach for equitable bicycle share station siting

机译:公平的自行车共享站选址的优化方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Bicycle share systems are becoming an increasingly popular feature of many urban areas across the United States. While these systems aim to increase transit mode options as well as overall bicycle ridership, bike share programs also face challenges and criticisms related to density and inequitable distribution of services. Key factors in the success of bicycle share include high station density as well as services that reach a variety of neighborhoods, though many current systems do not reach low-income areas. Equitable station distribution therefore appears to be a complex problem to address. We propose utilizing spatial analytics, including GIS and spatial optimization, to help site bicycle share stations across an urban region. Specifically we seek to apply a covering model to assess how many bicycle stations are needed, and where they should be located, so no user would have to travel too far for access. The city of Phoenix, Arizona, is used as a case study to illustrate the coverage and access tradeoffs possible through different investment strategies. Accordingly, for a given investment level, the set of stations is identified that provides the best access to the designated bike path network for the greatest number of potential users. Further, tradeoff options that differentially favor either network or population coverage are possible, and can be identified and evaluated through the proposed analytical framework.
机译:自行车共享系统正在成为美国许多城市地区越来越流行的功能。尽管这些系统旨在增加交通方式选择以及整体自行车出行率,但自行车共享计划也面临与密度和服务分配不均有关的挑战和批评。共享自行车成功的关键因素包括高车站密度以及可到达各种社区的服务,尽管许多当前的系统还不能到达低收入地区。因此,公平的电台分配似乎是一个需要解决的复杂问题。我们建议利用包括GIS和空间优化在内的空间分析来帮助市区内的站点自行车共享站点。具体来说,我们寻求应用覆盖模型来评估需要多少个自行车站以及自行车站的位置,因此没有用户需要走太远才能访问。以亚利桑那州菲尼克斯市为例,说明了通过不同投资策略可能实现的覆盖范围和访问权衡。因此,对于给定的投资水平,识别出一组站,其为最大数量的潜在用户提供对指定自行车路径网络的最佳访问。此外,有可能对网络或人口覆盖率产生不同的权衡选择,并且可以通过建议的分析框架进行确定和评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号