首页> 外文期刊>Journal of transport economics and policy >Are Britain's Railways Costing Too Much? Perspectives Based on TFP Comparisons with British Rail 1963-2002
【24h】

Are Britain's Railways Costing Too Much? Perspectives Based on TFP Comparisons with British Rail 1963-2002

机译:英国的铁路花费太多吗?基于TFP与英国铁路的比较观点1963-2002

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Following the Hatfield accident in October 2000, the cost of running Britain's railways has increased very sharply, leading to considerable debate about whether current cost levels are reasonable. This paper seeks to inform this debate by assessing post-Hatfield cost and TFP levels against the historical precedents set by British Rail and the early experience of the newly privatised industry. The results show that industry cash costs rose by 47 per cent between 1999/2000, the last financial year before Hatfield, and 2001/2002 — but, surprisingly, with train operating costs accounting for 42 per cent of this growth. The results also show that the post-Hatfield cost spike is unprecedented when compared against historical benchmarks. Analysis of long-term data on quality and safety measures indicates that an excessive focus on rail safety may offer part of the explanation for the cost growth.
机译:在2000年10月的哈特菲尔德(Hatfield)事故之后,英国铁路的运营成本急剧上升,引发了有关当前成本水平是否合理的大量争论。本文旨在通过评估英国铁路公司设定的历史先例和新私有化行业的早期经验,评估后哈菲尔德(Hatfield)成本和全要素生产率(TFP)水平,从而为这场辩论提供信息。结果表明,在1999/2000年(哈特菲尔德之前的上一个财政年度)到2001/2002年之间,行业现金成本增加了47%,但令人惊讶的是,火车运营成本占这一增长的42%。结果还显示,与历史基准相比,后哈特菲尔德飓风造成的成本飙升是前所未有的。对质量和安全措施的长期数据的分析表明,对铁路安全的过分关注可能为成本增长提供部分解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号