首页> 外文期刊>Journal of transport economics and policy >Second-best Decision Making of Railway Operators: How to Fix Fares, Frequency and Vehicle Size
【24h】

Second-best Decision Making of Railway Operators: How to Fix Fares, Frequency and Vehicle Size

机译:铁路运营商第二好的决策:如何确定票价,班次和车辆大小

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Optimal strategies in railway networks call for a differentiated treatment of fares, frequencies, and vehicle sizes in various links. However, for several reasons, railway operators may apply uniform levels for these decision variables. In this paper the authors investigate the welfare losses implied by uniform setting of fares per km, frequencies, or vehicle sizes. This is done within the context of a model with uniform cost structures but where demand levels vary across segments of the network. They demonstrate that the largest welfare loss results when frequencies are made uniform across links. Their results suggest that where differentiated prices are important to address issues such as congestion and directional asymmetries in demand, differentiated supply in terms of vehicle size, and in particular frequencies, are the preferred ways of addressing demand variations on different segments in a network.
机译:铁路网络中的最佳策略要求对各个环节的票价,班次和车辆大小进行区别对待。但是,由于多种原因,铁路运营商可能会为这些决策变量应用统一的级别。在本文中,作者研究了统一确定每公里票价,频率或车辆大小所隐含的福利损失。这是在具有统一成本结构的模型的上下文中完成的,但是需求水平随网络的各个部分而变化。他们证明,当频率在链路之间统一时,将造成最大的福利损失。他们的结果表明,在区分价格对于解决拥堵和需求方向性不对称等问题很重要的地方,从车辆大小(尤其是频率)方面区分供应是解决网络中不同网段需求变化的首选方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号