...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Transatlantic Studies >Explaining generosity: a comparison of US and European public opinion on foreign aid
【24h】

Explaining generosity: a comparison of US and European public opinion on foreign aid

机译:慷慨解囊:美国和欧洲对外国援助的舆论比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Whereas European public opinion generally supports foreign aid, the U.S. public is relatively critical of its proportionally smaller aid programs. This research uses cross-national, multivariate analysis of data from the World Values Survey to examine transatlantic differences in attitudes toward foreign aid programs. We find that a well-informed and financially comfortable public that associates foreign aid with their core values is more supportive of aid appropriations. Our research indicates that support for foreign aid is stronger in Europe because it coincides with European perceptions about the role of government in addressing social problems and greater European confidence in government institutions. This study provides evidence that the attitudes which provide the foundation for public support for domestic and international programs are linked. It also demonstrates that there are core value differences underpinning transatlantic gaps in public opinion.
机译:尽管欧洲舆论普遍支持外国援助,但美国公众对其按比例缩小援助计划却持相对批评态度。这项研究使用了来自世界价值调查的数据的跨国,多变量分析,以检验跨大西洋对外国援助计划态度的差异。我们发现,将外国援助与其核心价值联系起来的消息灵通,财务状况舒适的公众更能支持援助拨款。我们的研究表明,欧洲对外国援助的支持更强,因为它与欧洲对政府在解决社会问题中的作用的认识以及欧洲对政府机构的更大信心相吻合。这项研究提供了证据,表明为国内和国际计划的公众支持奠定基础的态度是相互联系的。它还表明,在舆论中,跨大西洋鸿沟背后存在着核心价值差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号