首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids >Breakage mechanics—Part Ⅱ: Modelling granular materials
【24h】

Breakage mechanics—Part Ⅱ: Modelling granular materials

机译:断裂力学-第二部分:颗粒材料建模

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The compression of granular materials has been traditionally modelled with the limitations of classical elasto-plasticity. The energy was implicitly assumed to dissipate from the frictional interaction of particles. However, the fact that brittle granular materials crush suggests that energy must also be dissipated from the fracturing of the grains, as in fracture mechanics. The concept of breakage as a thermomechanical internal variable was introduced in Part Ⅰ [Einav, I., 2006. Breakage mechanics—Part Ⅰ: theory. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 00,000-000] to describe the fracturing mechanisms. The theory allows to treat ideal theoretical materials that undergo dissipation purely from breakage with no other mechanism allowed for the energy consumption. However, as accounted for in elasto-plasticity, dissipation must also occur from the frictional rearrangement of grains. The combination of the two dissipative mechanisms of breakage and plasticity must therefore be investigated, as we do in this paper. Those two mechanisms are generally coupled, in the sense that one inevitably appears when the other develops. Plastic dissipation emerges as a by-product of breakage dissipation because after grains crush, local rearrangement must occur. This scenario may be termed an 'active breakage mechanism', and typifies compression deformations. In shear the plastic dissipation is dominant but breakage appears inevitably from grains abrasion. This scenario may be called a 'passive breakage mechanism'. Based on the coupling assumption, models are developed for granular materials. In particular, we show that in compression isotropic hardening of sands may appear without involving plastic strains, i.e., independent of frictional dissipation. This interpretation of hardening is different from the one used in classical critical state soil mechanics. However, frictional dissipation leads to plastic straining that are necessary for the models to be predictive in unloading.
机译:传统上,粒状材料的压缩是在经典弹塑性的限制下建模的。隐式假定能量从粒子的摩擦相互作用中消散。但是,脆性粒状材料压碎的事实表明,如断裂力学中一样,还必须从晶粒的破裂中耗散能量。在第一部分[Einav,I.,2006.断裂力学—第一部分:理论]中介绍了作为热机械内部变量的断裂概念。 J.机甲物理固体00,000-000]描述压裂机理。该理论允许处理理想的理论材料,这些理论材料仅由于断裂而耗散,而没有其他机制消耗能量。然而,考虑到弹塑性,耗散也必须由于晶粒的摩擦重排而发生。因此,必须像我们在本文中那样研究断裂和可塑性这两种耗散机制的结合。这两种机制通常是耦合的,从某种意义上说,当另一种机制发展时,一种机制不可避免地出现。塑性耗散是破碎耗散的副产品,因为在晶粒破碎后,必须进行局部重排。这种情况可以称为“主动断裂机制”,代表压缩变形。在剪切中,塑性耗散占主导地位,但不可避免地会由于晶粒磨损而出现断裂。这种情况可以称为“被动破坏机制”。基于耦合假设,为颗粒材料开发了模型。尤其是,我们表明,在压缩过程中,砂土可能会发生各向同性硬化,而不涉及塑性应变,即与摩擦耗散无关。这种硬化的解释不同于经典临界状态土壤力学中的解释。但是,摩擦耗散会导致塑性应变,这对于模型在卸载时具有预测性是必需的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号