...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Water Resources Association >MULTITEMPORAL SCALE HYDROGRAPH PREDICTION USING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS
【24h】

MULTITEMPORAL SCALE HYDROGRAPH PREDICTION USING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS

机译:基于人工神经网络的多时间尺度水文预报

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

An artificial neural network (ANN) provides a mathematically flexible structure to identify complex nonlinear relationship between inputs and outputs. A multilayer perceptron ANN technique with an error back propagation algorithm was applied to a multitime-scale prediction of the stage of a hydro-logically closed lake, Devils Lake (DL), and discharge of the Red River of the North at Grand Forks station (RR-GF) in North Dakota. The modeling exercise used 1 year (2002), 5 years (1998-2002), and 27 years (1975-2002) of data for the daily, weekly, and monthly predictions, respectively. The hydrometeo-rological data (precipitations P_((t)), P_((t-1)), P_((t-2)_, P_((t-3)), antecedent runoff/lake stage R_((t-1)), and air temperature T_((t)) were partitioned for training and for testing to predict the current hydro-graph at the selected DL and RR-GF stations. Performance of ANN was evaluated using three combinations of daily datasets (Input Ⅰ = P_((t)), P_((t-1)), P_((t-1)), P_((t-3)), T_((t)) and R_((t-1)); Input Ⅱ = Input-Ⅰ less P_((t)), P_((t-1)), P_((t-2)), P_((t-3)); and Input Ⅲ = Input-Ⅱ less T_((t))). Comparison of the mode output using Input Ⅰ data with the observed values showed average testing prediction efficiency (E) of 86 percent for DL basin and 46 percent for RR-GF basin, and higher efficiency for the daily than monthly simulations.
机译:人工神经网络(ANN)提供了一种数学上灵活的结构来识别输入和输出之间的复杂非线性关系。将具有错误反向传播算法的多层感知器ANN技术应用于水文密闭湖Devils Lake(DL)以及Grand Forks站北红河( RR-GF)。建模练习分别使用1年(2002),5年(1998-2002)和27年(1975-2002)的每日,每周和每月预测数据。水文气象数据(降水P _((t)),P _((t-1)),P _((t-2)_,P _((t-3)),前期径流/湖泊水位R _((t -1))和空气温度T _((t))被划分用于训练和测试以预测所选DL和RR-GF站的当前水文状况.ANN的性能使用每日数据集的三种组合进行评估(输入Ⅰ= P _((t)),P _((t-1)),P _((t-1)),P _((t-3)),T _((t))和R _((t-1) ));输入Ⅱ=输入Ⅰ减去P _((t)),P _((t-1)),P _((t-2)),P _((t-3));输入Ⅲ=输入- Ⅱ减去T _((t))),使用输入Ⅰ数据的模式输出与观测值的比较表明,DL盆地和RR-GF盆地的平均测试预测效率(E)分别为86%和46%,每天比每月模拟。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号