首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Water Resources Association >LOCATING EXISTING BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES WITHIN A WATERSHED: THE VALUE OF MULTIPLE METHODS
【24h】

LOCATING EXISTING BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES WITHIN A WATERSHED: THE VALUE OF MULTIPLE METHODS

机译:在流水线内找到现有的最佳管理实践:多种方法的价值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There is an increasing need to document the impacts of conservation-related best management practices (BMPs) on water quality within a watershed. However, this impact analysis depends upon accurate geospatial locations of existing practices, which are difficult to obtain. This study demonstrates and evaluates three different methods for obtaining geospatial information for BMPs. This study was focused on the Eagle Creek Watershed, a mixed use watershed in central Indiana. We obtained geospatial information for BMPs through government records, producer interviews, and remote-sensing aerial photo interpretation. Aerial photos were also used to validate the government records and producer interviews. This study shows the variation in results obtained from the three sources of information as well as the benefits and drawbacks of each method. Using only one method for obtaining BMP information can be incomplete, and this study demonstrates how multiple methods can be used for the most accurate picture.
机译:越来越需要记录与保护相关的最佳管理实践(BMP)对流域内水质的影响。但是,这种影响分析取决于难以获得的现有实践的准确地理空间位置。这项研究演示并评估了三种不同的方法来获取BMP的地理空间信息。这项研究的重点是位于印第安纳州中部的混合用途流域鹰溪流域。我们通过政府记录,生产者访谈和遥感航空照片解释获得了BMP的地理空间信息。航拍照片还用于验证政府记录和生产者访谈。这项研究显示了从三种信息来源获得的结果的差异,以及每种方法的优缺点。仅使用一种获取BMP信息的方法可能是不完整的,并且本研究演示了如何将多种方法用于获得最准确的图像。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号