首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Society for Information Science >How to Evaluate Universities in Terms of Their Relative Citation Impacts: Fractional Counting of Citations and the Normalization of Differences Among Disciplines
【24h】

How to Evaluate Universities in Terms of Their Relative Citation Impacts: Fractional Counting of Citations and the Normalization of Differences Among Disciplines

机译:如何根据相对引文影响评估大学:引文的分数计算和学科间差异的归一化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Fractional counting of citations can improve on ranking of multidisciplinary research units (such as universities) by normalizing the differences among fields of science in terms of differences in citation behavior. Furthermore, normalization in terms of citing papers abolishes the unsolved questions in scientometrics about the delineation of fields of science in terms of journals and normalization when comparing among different (sets of) journals. Using publication and citation data of seven Korean research universities, we demonstrate the advantages and the differences in the rankings, explain the possible statistics, and suggest ways to visualize the differences in (citing) audiences in terms of a network.
机译:通过根据引用行为的差异对科学领域之间的差异进行归一化,可以对引用的分数进行计数,从而提高多学科研究单位(例如大学)的排名。此外,在不同期刊(套)之间进行比较时,就引用论文而言的规范化消除了科学计量学中尚未解决的关于科学领域在期刊方面和规范化方面的问题。利用七所韩国研究型大学的出版和引文数据,我们展示了排名的优势和不同之处,解释了可能的统计数据,并提出了根据网络对(引用)受众差异进行可视化的方法。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者

    Loet Leydesdorff; Jung C. Shin;

  • 作者单位

    Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, Kloveniersburgwal 48, 1012 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands;

    Department of Education, Seoul National University, San 56-1, Sillim-Dong, Gwanak-Gu, Seoul 151-742, South Korea;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号