首页> 外文期刊>Journal of testing and evaluation >A Comparison of Two Crush Test Methods for Honeycombs Under Compression and Shear
【24h】

A Comparison of Two Crush Test Methods for Honeycombs Under Compression and Shear

机译:两种蜂窝压缩和剪切试验方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Two different crush test methods for aluminum honeycombs under compression and shear loads with respect to the out-of-plane direction are presented in this paper. The honeycomb specimen geometry and the test fixtures for the two test methods are first presented. The combined load method used a test frame with two actuators and the inclined load method employed a multiaxial load cell. The experimental results obtained from the two test methods are presented. The experimental results in terms of the normal crush and shear strengths obtained from the combined and inclined load methods are quite consistent. The experimental results also indicate that under inclined loads, neglecting the constraint force can result in significant error, and the error due to the negligence of the constraint force becomes more pronounced as the inclined loading angle and the in-plane orientation angle increase.
机译:本文提出了两种不同的铝蜂窝在压缩和剪切载荷下相对于面外方向的压溃试验方法。首先介绍了两种测试方法的蜂窝样品几何形状和测试夹具。组合载荷法使用带有两个执行器的测试框架,而倾斜载荷法则使用多轴载荷传感器。给出了从两种测试方法获得的实验结果。从组合荷载法和倾斜荷载法获得的正常抗压强度和抗剪强度方面的实验结果非常一致。实验结果还表明,在倾斜载荷下,忽略约束力会导致较大的误差,并且随着倾斜载荷角和面内定向角的增加,由于约束力的过失引起的误差会变得更加明显。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号