首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Systems and Software >Evolution of statistical analysis in empirical software engineering research: Current state and steps forward
【24h】

Evolution of statistical analysis in empirical software engineering research: Current state and steps forward

机译:经验软件工程研究中统计分析的演变:现状和前进的方向

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Software engineering research is evolving and papers are increasingly based on empirical data from a multitude of sources, using statistical tests to determine if and to what degree empirical evidence supports their hypotheses. To investigate the practices and trends of statistical analysis in empirical software engineering (ESE), this paper presents a review of a large pool of papers from top-ranked software engineering journals. First, we manually reviewed 161 papers and in the second phase of our method, we conducted a more extensive semi-automatic classification of papers spanning the years 2001-2015 and 5196 papers.Results from both review steps was used to: i) identify and analyse the predominant practices in ESE (e.g., using t-test or ANOVA), as well as relevant trends in usage of specific statistical methods (e.g., non-parametric tests and effect size measures) and, ii) develop a conceptual model for a statistical analysis workflow with suggestions on how to apply different statistical methods as well as guidelines to avoid pitfalls.Lastly, we confirm existing claims that current ESE practices lack a standard to report practical significance of results. We illustrate how practical significance can be discussed in terms of both the statistical analysis and in the practitioner's context. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:软件工程研究在不断发展,论文越来越多地基于来自多种来源的经验数据,使用统计检验来确定经验证据是否以及在何种程度上支持其假设。为了研究经验软件工程(ESE)中的统计分析的实践和趋势,本文介绍了来自顶级软件工程期刊的大量论文。首先,我们手动审查了161篇论文,在方法的第二阶段中,我们对2001-2015年和5196篇论文进行了更广泛的半自动分类。两个审查步骤的结果用于:i)识别和分析ESE中的主要做法(例如,使用t检验或ANOVA),以及使用特定统计方法(例如,非参数检验和效应大小度量)的相关趋势,并且ii)为以下方面开发概念模型:统计分析工作流程,其中包含有关如何应用不同统计方法的建议以及避免陷阱的指南。最后,我们确认现有的说法,即当前的ESE做法缺乏报告结果实际意义的标准。我们说明了如何根据统计分析和从业者的背景来讨论实际意义。 (C)2019 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号