首页> 外文期刊>Journal of structural engineering >Multihazard Analysis: Integrated Engineering and Social Science Approach
【24h】

Multihazard Analysis: Integrated Engineering and Social Science Approach

机译:多危害分析:工程与社会科学综合方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Reducing the potential impacts from a future disaster can be accomplished through decreasing the hazard exposure and reducing the community's vulnerability. Moreover, communities have both physical and social vulnerabilities that deserve attention; however, most engineering studies focus on assessing and mitigating the physical infrastructure without fully considering the social infrastructure. This paper offers a more holistic examination of vulnerability. Specifically, a two-stage analytical approach is presented that treats both an earthquake and a community's socioeconomic and demographic makeup as hazards. The first stage addresses the physical vulnerability of a community through retrofitting the residential building stock using an inventory of woodframe building archetypes. The second stage incorporates the social characteristics of a community through modeling six social vulnerability variables. A social disaster factor (SDF) is introduced to offer a quantifiable approach for understanding the intersections between physical and social vulnerabilities. Case studies are presented for three communities: a middle-class ZIP code, the poorest ZIP code, and the wealthiest ZIP code, all in Los Angeles County, California. The SDF is computed and compared for the case studies during both stages of the analysis. The analyses demonstrate that when only physical vulnerabilities are modeled, one might incorrectly conclude that the impacts of the event are virtually eliminated. However, when social vulnerabilities are modeled as a hazard alongside the physical vulnerabilities, the projected impacts of the disaster are severe, especially for the most vulnerable populations, in terms of injuries, fatalities, posttraumatic stress disorder diagnoses, and number of dislocated households. In the combined model, these impacts run along racial and economic fault lines, with the most marginalized communities experiencing the most extreme projected losses. These results may have implications for both theory and practice. (C) 2017 American Society of Civil Engineers.
机译:减少未来灾难的潜在影响可以通过减少危害暴露并降低社区的脆弱性来实现。此外,社区具有应引起注意的身体和社会脆弱性;但是,大多数工程研究都集中在评估和缓解物理基础结构上,而没有充分考虑社会基础结构。本文对漏洞进行了更全面的研究。具体而言,提出了一种分为两个阶段的分析方法,该方法将地震和社区的社会经济和人口构成都视为危险。第一阶段通过使用木结构建筑原型清单翻新住宅建筑来解决社区的物理脆弱性。第二阶段通过对六个社会脆弱性变量进行建模来整合社区的社会特征。引入了社会灾难因素(SDF),以提供一种可量化的方法来理解物理脆弱性和社会脆弱性之间的交集。针对三个社区进行了案例研究:中产阶级邮政编码,最贫穷的邮政编码和最富有的邮政编码,所有这些都位于加利福尼亚州的洛杉矶县。在分析的两个阶段中,都会针对案例研究计算并比较SDF。分析表明,仅对物理漏洞进行建模时,可能会错误地得出结论,实际上消除了事件的影响。但是,如果将社会脆弱性与自然脆弱性一起建模为一种危害,那么灾难的预计影响是严重的,特别是对于最脆弱的人群,无论是在伤害,死亡,创伤后压力障碍诊断以及搬迁家庭数量方面。在组合模型中,这些影响沿着种族和经济断层线,最边缘化的社区遭受的损失最为极端。这些结果可能对理论和实践都有影响。 (C)2017年美国土木工程师学会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号