首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research >SINGLE-LEG LATERAL, HORIZONTAL, AND VERTICAL JUMP ASSESSMENT: RELIABILITY, INTERRELATIONSHIPS, AND ABILITY TO PREDICT SPRINT AND CHANGE-OF-DIRECTION PERFORMANCE
【24h】

SINGLE-LEG LATERAL, HORIZONTAL, AND VERTICAL JUMP ASSESSMENT: RELIABILITY, INTERRELATIONSHIPS, AND ABILITY TO PREDICT SPRINT AND CHANGE-OF-DIRECTION PERFORMANCE

机译:单边横向,水平和垂直跳变评估:可靠性,相互关系以及预测应变和方向变化性能的能力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The purposes of this study were to determine the reliability of unilateral vertical, horizontal, and lateral countermovement jump assessments, the interrelationship between these tests, and their usefulness as predictors of sprint (10 m) and change-of-direction (COD) performance for 80 men and women physical education students. Jump performance was assessed on a contact mat and sprint, and COD performances were assessed using timing lights. With regard to the reliability statistics, the largest coefficient of variation (CV) was observed for the vertical jump (CV = 6.7-7.2%) of both genders, whereas the sprint and COD assessments had smallest variability (CV = 0.8 to 2.8%). All intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were greater than 0.85, except for the men's COD assessment with the alternate leg. The shared variance between the single-leg vertical, horizontal, and lateral jumps for men and women was less than 50%, indicating that the jumps are relatively independent of one another and represent different leg strength/power qualities. The ability of the jumps to predict sprint and COD performance was limited R^sup 2^ < 43%). It would seem that the ability to change direction with 1 leg is relatively independent of a COD with the other leg, especially in the women (R^sup 2^ < 30%) of this study. However, if 1 jump assessment were selected to predict sprint and COD performance in a test battery, the single-leg horizontal countermovement jump would seem the logical choice, given the results of this study. Many of the findings in this study have interesting diagnostic and training implications for the strength and conditioning coach. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
机译:这项研究的目的是确定单侧垂直,水平和横向反向运动跳跃评估的可靠性,这些测试之间的相互关系以及它们作为冲刺(10 m)和方向改变(COD)性能预测指标的有用性80名男女体育专业学生。在接触垫和冲刺上评估跳跃性能,并使用定时灯评估COD性能。关于可靠性统计数据,两个性别的垂直跳动(CV = 6.7-7.2%)均观察到最大变异系数(CV),而冲刺和COD评估的变异性最小(CV = 0.8至2.8%) 。所有的组内相关系数(ICC)均大于0.85,除了男子用另一条腿进行的COD评估外。男性和女性单腿垂直,水平和横向跳跃之间的共同方差小于50%,这表明这些跳跃相对彼此独立,代表不同的腿部力量/力量素质。跳跃预测冲刺和COD性能的能力受到限制(R ^ sup 2 ^ <43%)。似乎一只脚改变方向的能力相对独立于另一只腿的COD,尤其是在该研究的女性中(R ^ sup 2 ^ <30%)。但是,如果选择1次跳跃评估来预测测试电池中的冲刺和COD性能,则根据本研究的结果,单腿水平反向运动跳跃似乎是合理的选择。这项研究中的许多发现对于力量和条件教练具有有趣的诊断和训练意义。 [出版物摘要]

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research》 |2009年第4期|p.1140-1147|共8页
  • 作者单位

    CESAR MEYLAN,1 TRAVIS MCMASTER,1 JOHN CRONIN,1,2 NUR IKHWAN MOHAMMAD,1 CAMYN ROGERS,1AND MELISSA DEKLERK11 School of Exercise, Biomedical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia;

    and 2 Institute ofSport and Recreation Research New Zealand, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New ZealandAddress correspondence to César Meylan, c.meylan@ecu.edu.au.23(4)/1140-1147Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research© 2009 National Strength and Conditioning Association;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:33:33

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号