...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research >THE ACUTE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT DURATIONS OF STATIC STRETCHING ON DYNAMIC BALANCE PERFORMANCE
【24h】

THE ACUTE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT DURATIONS OF STATIC STRETCHING ON DYNAMIC BALANCE PERFORMANCE

机译:静态拉伸不同持续时间对动态平衡性能的急性影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of different durations of static stretching on dynamic balance. Women (N = 28) were tested before and after 2 stretching interventions and a control condition on 3 separate days, at least 48 hours apart. The stretching sessions involved a cycle ergometer warm-up at 70 rpm and 70 W followed by passive stretching of the lower-body muscles. Each stretching position was held at a point of mild discomfort and repeated 3 times with 15 seconds between stretches. In the 2 stretching protocols, the positions were maintained for 15 or 45 seconds. The control condition involved the same cycle ergometer warm-up, with a 26-minute rest period between pre- and posttests. Balance was assessed using the Biodex Balance System. A 2-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used with the effects of study condition (control, 15 seconds, 45 seconds) and time (pre-, postscores). Post hoc paired t-tests were used when appropriate to determine possible statistical significance between pre- and posttest scores. Analyses indicated no significant main effects for either study condition or time. However, there was a significant condition × time interaction (p < 0.05). Post hoc analyses indicated that the 15-second condition produced a significant improvement in the balance scores (p < 0.01), with no significant effects with the control condition or the 45-second treatment. The results of this study reveal that a stretching protocol of 45-second hold durations does not adversely affect balance when using the current stabilometry testing procedure. Furthermore, a stretching intervention with 15-second hold durations may improve balance performance by decreasing postural instability. Strength and conditioning professionals concerned with reported performance limitations associated with static stretching should consider applying shorter-duration stretching protocols when aiming to improve balance performance. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
机译:这项研究的目的是检查静态拉伸的不同持续时间对动态平衡的影响。在2次拉伸干预和对照条件之前和之后的3天内分别对女性(N = 28)进行了测试,间隔3天,间隔至少48小时。拉伸过程包括以70 rpm和70 W的功率周期仪进行热身,然后被动拉伸下半身肌肉。每个拉伸位置保持在轻度不适的位置,并在两次拉伸之间重复15次,重复3次。在2个拉伸方案中,位置保持15或45秒。控制条件包括相同的自行车测功机热身,测试前和测试后之间有26分钟的休息时间。使用Biodex平衡系统评估平衡。对研究条件(对照,15秒,45秒)和时间(前,后得分)的影响使用方差的2次重复测量分析。在适当时使用事后配对t检验来确定测试前和测试后分数之间的可能统计显着性。分析表明,对于研究条件或时间没有明显的主要影响。但是,存在显着条件×时间交互作用(p <0.05)。事后分析表明,15秒钟的病情会使平衡评分显着改善(p <0.01),而对照病情或45秒钟的治疗无明显影响。这项研究的结果表明,使用当前的稳定性测试程序时,保持时间为45秒的拉伸方案不会对平衡产生不利影响。此外,保持时间为15秒的拉伸干预可以通过减少姿势不稳定性来改善平衡性能。与静态拉伸有关的报告性能局限性的力量和调理专业人员,在提高平衡性能时应考虑采用较短时间的拉伸方案。 [出版物摘要]

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research》 |2009年第1期|p.141-147|共7页
  • 作者单位

    PABLO B. COSTA,1 BARBARA S. GRAVES,2 MICHAEL WHITEHURST,2 AND PATRICK L. JACOBS21 Department of Health and Exercise Science, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma;

    and 2 Department of Exercise Scienceand Health Promotion, Florida Atlantic University, Davie, FloridaAddress correspondence to Patrick L. Jacobs, pjacobs4@fau.edu.23(1)/141-147Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research© 2009 National Strength and Conditioning Association;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号