首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Strategic Studies >Thinking Globally and Acting Locally: Counterinsurgency Lessons from Modern Wars - A Reply to Jones and Smith
【24h】

Thinking Globally and Acting Locally: Counterinsurgency Lessons from Modern Wars - A Reply to Jones and Smith

机译:全球化思考和地方行动:现代战争中的平叛教训-对琼斯和史密斯的回复

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The US Army/Marine Corps Counterinsurgency Field Manual (FM 3-24), published on 15 December 2006, has attracted an extraordinary amount of attention for a doctrinal publication. A persistent criticism of the doctrine is that it fails to reflect the changing nature of modern insurgencies. This criticism has focused on the fact that many of the principles expressed in the manual are rooted in the 'classical' counterinsurgency texts authored by theorists and practitioners whose frame of reference was defined by Cold War-era wars of national liberation and the Maoist model of guerrilla warfare. According to this argument, today's insurgencies, most notably in Iraq and Afghanistan, are not like those that came before: they are, variously and at once, less hierarchical, more globalized, and more focused on the media and information domain.
机译:2006年12月15日出版的《美国陆军/海军陆战队平叛野战手册》(FM 3-24)引起了人们的广泛关注。对这一学说的持续批评是,它不能反映现代叛乱性质的变化。这种批评集中在以下事实上:手册中表达的许多原则都植根于理论家和实践者所撰写的“古典”平叛文本中,其理论框架是由冷战时期的民族解放战争和毛泽东主义的模式所定义的。游击战。根据这一论点,当今的叛乱,尤其是在伊拉克和阿富汗,与以前的叛乱不同:它们既有不同的形式,也有不同的层次,更加全球化,并且更加专注于媒体和信息领域。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Strategic Studies》 |2010年第1期|123-138|共16页
  • 作者

    JOHN A. NAGL; BRIAN M. BURTON;

  • 作者单位

    Center for a New American Security (CNAS), Washington DC, USA;

    Center for a New American Security (CNAS), Washington DC, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号