...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness >The effect of mountain bike suspensions on vibrations and off-road uphill performance
【24h】

The effect of mountain bike suspensions on vibrations and off-road uphill performance

机译:山地自行车悬架对振动和越野上坡性能的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Aim. This study evaluates the effect of front suspension (FS) and dual suspension (DS) mountain-bike on performance and vibrations during off-road uphill riding.rnMethods. Thirteen male cyclists (27±5 years, 70±6 kg, VO_(2max) 59±6 mL·kg~(-1)·min~(-1), mean±SD) performed, in a random sequence, at their lactate threshold, an off-road uphill course (1.69 km, 212 m elevation gain) with both type of bicycles. Variable measured: a) VO_2 consumption (K4b2 analyzer, Cosmed), b) power output (SRM) c) gain in altitude and d) 3-D accelerations under the saddle and at the wheel (Physilog, EPFL, Switzerland). Power spectral analysis (Fourier) was performed from the vertical acceleration data.rnResults. Respectively for the FS and DS mountain bike: speed amounted to 7.5±0.7 km·h~(-1) and 7.4±0.8 km·h~(-1), (NS), energy expenditure 1.39±0.16 kW and 1.38±0.18, (NS), gross efficiency 0.161±0.013 and 0.159±0.013, (NS), peak frequency of vibration under the saddle 4.78±2.85 Hz and 2.27±0.2 Hz (P < 0.01) and median-frequency of vertical displacements of the saddle 9.41±1.47 Hz and 5.78±2.27 Hz (P < 0.01). Conclusion. Vibrations at the saddle level of the DS bike are of low frequencies whereas those of the FS bike are mostly of high frequencies. In the DS bike, the torque produced by the cyclist at the pedal level may generate low frequency vibrations. We conclude that the DS bike absorbs more high frequencyrnvibrations, is more comfortable and performs as well as the FS bicycle.
机译:目标。这项研究评估了前悬架(FS)和双悬架(DS)山地自行车对越野上坡骑行期间的性能和振动的影响。 13位男性自行车手(27±5岁,70±6 kg,VO_(2max)59±6 mL·kg〜(-1)·min〜(-1),平均值±SD)按随机顺序进行乳酸阈值,这两种类型的自行车均为越野上坡路线(1.69 km,高程212 m)。测量的变量:a)VO_2消耗量(K4b2分析仪,Cosmed),b)功率输出(SRM)c)高度增益和d)鞍座和车轮下的3-D加速度(Physilog,EPFL,瑞士)。从垂直加速度数据进行功率谱分析(Fourier)。 FS和DS山地自行车分别为:速度分别为7.5±0.7 km·h〜(-1)和7.4±0.8 km·h〜(-1),(NS),能量消耗为1.39±0.16 kW和1.38±0.18 ,(NS),总效率0.161±0.013和0.159±0.013,(NS),鞍座下的振动峰值频率4.78±2.85 Hz和2.27±0.2 Hz(P <0.01)和鞍座垂直位移的中值频率9.41±1.47 Hz和5.78±2.27 Hz(P <0.01)。结论。 DS自行车的鞍座水平振动频率较低,而FS自行车的水平振动频率较高。在DS自行车中,骑车人在踏板处产生的扭矩可能会产生低频振动。我们得出的结论是,DS自行车比FS自行车吸收更多的高频振动,更舒适且性能更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号