首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Southern African Studies >‘Blame it on the Weeds’: Politics, Poverty, and Ecology in the New South Africa
【24h】

‘Blame it on the Weeds’: Politics, Poverty, and Ecology in the New South Africa

机译:“怪异杂草”:新南非的政治,贫困与生态

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In January of 2000, spectacular fires burned in the natural veld of Cape Town, South Africa. As the fire-fighting effort finished, a theory emerged: invasive alien species, trees from other countries, such as Australia and the United States, were to blame for the fires. While the invasive alien hypothesis captured the attention of media and policy makers alike, there was little ecological evidence to support it. This article places the fires of 2000 in a longer history of post-apartheid policy and science surrounding invasive alien floral species, arguing that the fires allowed for a synergy between concerns over poverty relief, nature conservation, and scientific research. The most visible example of this synergy was an increased commitment to the Working for Water programme on the Cape Peninsula, a large-scale employment programme utilising unskilled labour to clear invasive alien species in order to conserve South African water resources. In addition to providing employment for South Africa's poorest citizens, Working for Water provided funding for ecological research about invasive alien species. The studies that resulted from this funding focused on gathering information to make practical suggestions for invasive species control. Although the focus of these studies was on management, the science used was itself as rigorous as it had ever been. In the post-apartheid era, as poverty relief and nature conservation came together, scientists ensured that they would continue to play a role in nature conservation by making their research relevant to both invasive species control and to poverty relief.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057070.2010.527642
机译:2000年1月,壮观的大火在南非开普敦的自然草原上燃烧。随着灭火工作的完成,出现了一种理论:外来入侵物种,来自其他国家(例如澳大利亚和美国)的树木应归咎于大火。尽管外来入侵性假设引起了媒体和政策制定者的关注,但几乎没有生态学证据支持这一假设。本文将2000年的大火置于种族隔离之后的政策和科学的较长历史中,这些政策和科学围绕外来入侵性花卉物种进行,认为大火使人们对减贫,自然保护和科学研究的关注产生协同作用。这种协同作用最明显的例子是对Cape Peninsula半岛上的“水上工作”计划的承诺增加,该计划是利用非熟练劳动力清除外来入侵物种以节省南非水资源的大规模就业计划。除了为南非最贫困的公民提供就业机会,水务工作还为外来入侵物种的生态研究提供了资金。从这笔资金中进行的研究集中于收集信息,为入侵物种的控制提出实用建议。尽管这些研究的重点放在管理上,但所使用的科学本身却从未像现在这样严格。在后种族隔离时代,随着扶贫与自然保护相结合,科学家们通过使研究与入侵物种控制和扶贫相关,确保了他们继续在自然保护中发挥作用。查看全文下载全文相关变体addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057070.2010.527642

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号