首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Southern African Studies >Discipline and Punishment in ZANLA: 1964-1979
【24h】

Discipline and Punishment in ZANLA: 1964-1979

机译:扎纳拉的纪律处分:1964-1979年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Discipline is a subject more referred to than examined in the history of Zimbabwe's liberation war. While there are references to the administration of punishment in specific circumstances or, more often, contemptuous remarks by Rhodesian soldiers regarding the unprofessional conduct of guerrillas in general, few studies have investigated the systematic deployment of disciplinary structures in Zimbabwe's guerrilla movements. Drawing on internal sources, this article explores this subject by focusing on the Zimbabwe National Liberation Army (ZANLA), the armed wing of the Zimbabwe African National Union (ZANU), in the 1960s and 1970s. These sources show that there was a thin line between the party and its army. The rules governing both were mutually interchangeable under the principle that the ‘vanguard party’ should guide the gun. The orthodox view regarding the ‘triumph of the military’ in ZANU is confirmed, but the article goes further to demonstrate how the ZANU High Command gained the capacity to determine the management of discipline and the administration of punishment such that it was, in practice, the gun that guided the party. With time ZANU became highly militarised. The article identifies three phases of this process. Towards the end of the war, and after ZANU and ZANLA had undergone a series of internal crises, they faced a serious challenge of ‘anarchism’ in the operational zones. This required ZANU's renewed Central Committee to organise a strategy to restore order. This strategy, spearheaded by the Departments of Defence and of the Commissariat, inadvertently elevated these two units as the party's most influential and powerful organs, a legacy that haunts ZANU to this day.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057070.2011.602896
机译:在津巴布韦解放战争的历史中,纪律性是一个比提及更多的话题。尽管提到了在特定情况下实行处罚,或更经常地,罗得西亚士兵对游击队的不专业行为发表轻蔑的言论,但很少有研究调查津巴布韦游击运动中纪律组织的系统部署。本文利用内部资源探讨了这一主题,重点讨论了1960年代和1970年代津巴布韦非洲民族联盟(ZANU)的武装部门津巴布韦民族解放军(ZANLA)。这些资料表明,党与军队之间的界限很窄。根据“先锋党”应指导枪支的原则,关于这两个规则的规定可以相互互换。关于ZANU中“军队的胜利”的正统观点得到了证实,但是该文章进一步论证了ZANU高级司令部如何获得确定纪律管理和惩罚管理的能力,在实践中,指导党的枪支。随着时间的流逝,ZANU变得非常军事化。本文确定了此过程的三个阶段。战争快结束时,在扎努和扎纳经历了一系列内部危机之后,他们在战区面临着“无政府主义”的严峻挑战。这就要求ZANU的新一届中央委员会组织一项恢复秩序的战略。这项由国防部和军团领导的策略无意间将这两个部门提升为该党最有影响力和最强大的器官,这一遗产至今仍困扰着ZANU。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“ Taylor &Francis Online”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057070.2011.602896

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号