...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of socio-economics >Confidence in the economy in times of crisis: Social representations of experts and laypeople
【24h】

Confidence in the economy in times of crisis: Social representations of experts and laypeople

机译:危机时期对经济的信心:专家和非专业人士的社会代表

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study investigates experts' and laypeople's social representations of the financial and economic crisis, as widely discussed in the media after the fall of Lehman Brothers in 2008. Financial experts (n = 156) and laypeople (n = 153) with low versus high confidence in the economic recovery spontaneously associated thoughts and beliefs about the crisis and to economic and political stakeholders. Following a mixed-methods approach, they evaluated economic stakeholders with regard to six trust items. The study was conducted in March 2010 in Austria, which was moderately affected by the crisis. The results indicate that economic variables (e.g., unemployment) were central to the social representations of the crisis, while underlying feelings of unfairness and egoism surfaced during the ongoing process of association. The social representation did not comprise a general criticism of the economic system. The differences between the subgroups depended on identification-based self-protection and economic knowledge. Experts and laypeople tended to attribute the economic crisis to specific stakeholders in a self-protecting way: experts blamed the media, laypeople blamed the managers, and both blamed the politicians. Interestingly, the subgroups tended to evaluate the banks as being relatively neutral. Expertise and differentiated economic knowledge was related to confidence in the economic recovery. Thus, the perceived capability of politicians in terms of competence and morality seems crucial for regaining public confidence in the economy.
机译:正如雷曼兄弟(Lehman Brothers)在2008年倒台后,媒体对这一问题的调查一样,本研究调查了专家和非专业人士对金融和经济危机的社会表现形式。金融专家(n = 156)和非专业人士(n = 153)低信任度与高信任度在经济复苏中,人们自发地将有关危机以及对经济和政治利益相关者的思想和信念联系在一起。按照混合方法,他们评估了六个利益相关者的经济利益相关者。这项研究于2010年3月在奥地利进行,当时该危机受到了中等程度的影响。结果表明,经济变量(例如失业率)是危机的社会表征的核心,而在正在进行的结社过程中却浮现了潜在的不公平和利己主义感觉。社会代表权并不包括对经济体系的一般性批评。亚组之间的差异取决于基于身份的自我保护和经济知识。专家和外行人士倾向于以自我保护的方式将经济危机归因于特定的利益相关者:专家们将责任归咎于媒体,专家将责任归咎于管理者,而两者都归咎于政客。有趣的是,这些分组倾向于将银行评价为相对中立。专业知识和与众不同的经济知识与对经济复苏的信心有关。因此,政客在能力和道德上的感知能力对于重新获得公众对经济的信心似乎至关重要。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of socio-economics 》 |2012年第5期| p.603-614| 共12页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Applied Psychology: Work, Education and Economy, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Universitaetsstrasse 7 (NIC), A-1010 Vienna, Austria;

    Department of Applied Psychology: Work, Education and Economy, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Universitaetsstrasse 7 (NIC), A-1010 Vienna, Austria;

    Department of Applied Psychology: Work, Education and Economy, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Universitaetsstrasse 7 (NIC), A-1010 Vienna, Austria;

    Department of Applied Psychology: Work, Education and Economy, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Universitaetsstrasse 7 (NIC), A-1010 Vienna, Austria;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    social representations; financial crisis; economic crisis; confidence; trust;

    机译:社会代表;金融危机;经济危机;置信度;信任;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号