Supervision is considered to be a determining factor in the quality of service to clients, the job satisfaction of social workers, and the level of professional development they achieve. How supervisors use their authority affects their relationships with subordinates, which in turn influences service outcomes. This case study reveals the micro-process of the interplay of power in the supervisor-supervisee dyad, the influence of cultural factors on attitudes toward hierarchical relationships, and subordination to authority in the supervisory dyad. Respondents who considered supervision to be counterproductive or disempowering employed tactics to hide their negative attitude, and concealed important cases and project materials, which hindered the disclosure of mistakes. Redistributing power in the current hierarchical supervisor-supervisee relationship could lead to fewer instances of game playing in the supervisory dyad and facilitate disclosure, which is important in ethical practice.View full textDownload full textKeywordssocial work supervision, power, cultural factors, supervisory relationship, micro-politicsRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2010.536201
展开▼
机译：监督被认为是对客户的服务质量，社会工作者的工作满意度以及他们所达到的专业发展水平的决定性因素。主管如何使用自己的权限会影响他们与下属的关系，进而影响服务成果。本案例研究揭示了监督者与监督者权力之间相互作用的微观过程，文化因素对态度关系的态度的影响以及监督者对权力的服从。认为监督会适得其反或丧失权力的受访者使用策略隐藏他们的消极态度，并隐瞒重要案例和项目资料，从而阻碍了错误的披露。在当前的分级监督者/监督者关系中重新分配权力可能会导致较少的监督案例中的游戏实例并促进披露，这在道德实践中很重要。查看全文下载全文关键字社会工作监督，权力，文化因素，监督关系，微观-politicsRelated var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand：“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”，servicescompact：“ citeulike，netvibes，twitter，technorati，delicious，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，更多”，发布：“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2010.536201
展开▼
