首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Safety Research >The antecedents, experience, and coping strategies of driver boredom in young adult males
【24h】

The antecedents, experience, and coping strategies of driver boredom in young adult males

机译:成年男性驾驶员无聊的前因,经验和应对策略

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: Road crash statistics are evidence of the severe consequences resulting from human error, especially among young adult males. Drivers perform best and safest when they are adequately engaged in the driving task. Boredom and a lack of engagement in the driving task may cause risk taking and phone use. However, the antecedents to driver boredom, the subjective experience itself, as well as the coping strategies to combat boredom are not well understood. The aim of this study was to investigate these aspects. Method: We carried out a qualitative study in a simulated, safe, yet highly immersive driving environment. The 24 participants included male drivers aged 18 to 25 susceptible to risky driving and phone use. A phenomenological framework was used to analyze their accounts of the experience of boredom while driving. Results: Results indicate that situations giving rise to driver boredom include low traffic, slow or constant speed, and routine drives. Feelings comprising the experience were frustration, vigilance, relaxing, autopilot, mind wandering, and discomfort. Coping mechanisms manifest themselves in approach strategies related to the driving task such as speeding, which are often dangerous, and avoidance strategies, which include phone use. Conclusions: We conclude that driver boredom bears similarities to the experience of boredom at work (unlike boredom at home) due to the situational constraints, where people feel stuck, trapped, or obliged to remain vigilant. Practical applications: The findings present an opportunity for the road safety and automotive technology community to address the issue of under-stimulation through safety interventions aimed at increased task engagement Our work can also aid in investigating driver experiences in partially automated driving, which is likely to induce boredom as well. (C) 2016 National Safety Council and Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:简介:道路碰撞统计数据是人为错误造成的严重后果的证据,尤其是在成年男性中。当驾驶员充分从事驾驶任务时,他们的表现最佳,最安全。无聊和缺乏参与驾驶任务可能会导致冒险和使用电话。但是,对驾驶员无聊的前因,主观经验本身以及应对无聊的应对策略还没有很好的理解。这项研究的目的是调查这些方面。方法:我们在模拟,安全但高度身临其境的驾驶环境中进行了定性研究。 24名参与者包括18至25岁的男性驾驶员,容易受到危险驾驶和电话使用的影响。一个现象学的框架被用来分析他们在开车时无聊的经历。结果:结果表明,导致驾驶员感到无聊的情况包括交通流量低,慢速或恒定速度以及常规驾驶。经历的感受包括沮丧,警惕,放松,自动驾驶,精神流浪和不适。应对机制体现在与驾驶任务相关的进近策略中,例如超速(通常很危险)和回避策略(其中包括使用电话)。结论:我们得出的结论是,驾驶员的无聊感与工作中的无聊感(与在家中的无聊感)相似,这是由于情景限制,人们感到被困,被困或不得不保持警惕。实际应用:研究结果为道路安全和汽车技术界提供了机会,通过旨在增加任务参与度的安全干预措施来解决刺激不足的问题。我们的工作还可以帮助调查部分自动驾驶的驾驶员体验,这很可能会也会引起无聊。 (C)2016国家安全委员会和Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Safety Research》 |2016年第12期|69-82|共14页
  • 作者单位

    Queensland Univ Technol, Urban Informat Res Lab, 2 George St, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia|QUT, Ctr Accid Res & Rd Safety Queensland, 130 Victoria Pk Rd, Kelvin Grove, Qld 4059, Australia;

    Queensland Univ Technol, Urban Informat Res Lab, 2 George St, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia;

    Queensland Univ Technol, Urban Informat Res Lab, 2 George St, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia|QUT, Ctr Accid Res & Rd Safety Queensland, 130 Victoria Pk Rd, Kelvin Grove, Qld 4059, Australia;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Road safety; Distraction; Risk taking; Phenomenology;

    机译:道路安全;分心;冒险;现象学;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号