首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, Statistics in Society >Choosing between alternative classification criteria to measure the labour force state
【24h】

Choosing between alternative classification criteria to measure the labour force state

机译:在替代分类标准之间进行选择以衡量劳动力状况

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Labour force counting relies on general guidelines that are set by the International Labour Office to classify individuals into three labour force states: employment, unemployment and inactivity. However, the resulting statistics are known to be sensitive to slight variations in operational definitions which are prima facie consistent with the general guidelines. We consider two interpretations of the general guidelines, operationalized by the criterion that is currently followed by Eurostat and a criterion that was followed by the Italian Statistical Office up to 1992. After showing that the labour force statistics resulting from the two criteria differ considerably, we compare individuals whose classification depends on the criterion that is adopted with individuals whose classification is common between criteria to study the boundary between unemployment and inactivity. An application of our strategy is presented using data from the Italian Labour Force Survey, painting a picture neatly against the criterion that is currently followed by Eurostat.
机译:劳动力计数依赖于国际劳工局制定的一般准则,可将个人分为三种劳动力状态:就业,失业和不工作。但是,众所周知,所得的统计数据对操作定义的细微变化敏感,这些定义在本质上与通用准则相符。我们考虑对通用准则的两种解释,分别由欧盟统计局当前遵循的准则和直到1992年意大利统计局遵循的准则进行操作。在表明由这两个准则产生的劳动力统计数据存在很大差异之后,我们将分类取决于所采用标准的个人与标准之间具有共同分类的个人进行比较,以研究失业和不活动之间的界限。我们使用来自意大利劳动力调查的数据展示了我们策略的应用,并与欧盟统计局目前遵循的标准巧妙地描绘了一幅图画。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号