首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the royal Asiatic society >Mongol Siege Warfare on the Banks of the Euphrates and the Question of Gunpowder (1260-1312)
【24h】

Mongol Siege Warfare on the Banks of the Euphrates and the Question of Gunpowder (1260-1312)

机译:幼发拉底河沿岸的蒙古围困战和火药问题(1260-1312)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article discusses the Mongol approach to warfare, then goes on to consider the Mongols' conversion to the notion that they would have to develop a siege train, since walled cities cannot easily be taken by a cavalry charge. The contribution of Chinese siege engineers is discussed, and there is a survey of Chinese siege techniques as they evolved before the Mongol period. The author considers the evidence for the use of inflammable materials, and then moves to the question of gunpowder. The widespread (not quite universal) consensus that the Chinese used gunpowder is discussed, and then attention moves to Hulegu's expedition to western Asia in the 1250s. It is pointed out that none of the major sources seems to imply the use of anything that might be construed as gunpowder technology during those campaigns. Lastly, the author considers, in some detail, sieges conducted by the Ilkhanid Mongols against Mamluk border strongholds during the succeeding decades, drawing attention to and explaining those sieges' increasing lack of success.
机译:本文讨论了蒙古人的作战方法,然后继续考虑蒙古人的转变,即他们必须发展攻城列车,因为围墙城市无法轻易由骑兵冲锋。讨论了中国攻城工程师的贡献,并对中国攻城技术在蒙古时代之前的发展进行了调查。作者考虑了使用易燃材料的证据,然后转向了火药问题。讨论了关于中国使用火药的广泛共识(不是很普遍),然后将注意力转移到1250年代Hulegu远征西亚。要指出的是,在这些运动中,主要来源似乎都没有暗示使用任何可能被解释为火药技术的东西。最后,作者更详细地考虑了伊尔克汉尼德蒙古人在随后的几十年中对马穆鲁克边境据点进行的围困,提请人们注意并解释这些围困的日益缺乏成功的情况。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of the royal Asiatic society》 |2009年第3期|355-370|共16页
  • 作者

    KATE RAPHAEL;

  • 作者单位

    The Hebrew University of Jerusalem;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:38:24

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号