首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Robotic Surgery >Camera and trocar placement for robot-assisted radical and partial nephrectomy: which configuration provides optimal visualization and instrument mobility?
【24h】

Camera and trocar placement for robot-assisted radical and partial nephrectomy: which configuration provides optimal visualization and instrument mobility?

机译:用于机器人辅助的根治性和部分性肾切除术的摄像头和套管针放置:哪种配置可提供最佳的可视化效果和器械移动性?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Proper camera and trocar placement is critical to the success of minimally invasive procedures. For robot-assisted renal surgery, two basic trocar configurations have been described. The medial approach, using a 30° downward-angled lens mimics a traditional transperitoneal laparoscopic configuration. An alternative configuration, using a 0° or 30° upward-angled lens approach locates the camera laterally, evoking a position sense similar to a retroperitoneal approach. Our objective is to compare the differences between these two standard approaches for robot-assisted renal surgery. After performing a review and analysis of available literature, our group tested both the medial and lateral camera approaches during robotic renal surgery performed in human patients. The medial approach provides a wide field of view, because of the relatively greater distance to the target structures and a horizon line closer to the patient’s midline. The lateral configuration offers significantly different visualization. The relative proximity to the target structures and a higher horizon line results in a comparatively restricted field of vision. Instrument mobility is comparable between the two approaches. Meta-analysis of the literature reveals that both approaches provide comparable overall operative times for both radical and partial nephrectomy, though there is a trend towards shorter overall operative times for partial nephrectomy performed through a medial approach. The medial trocar configuration provides a familiar working environment for both surgeon and assistant; the wide-angle view enables enhanced visualization of surrounding structures and tracking of the instruments inserted by the assistant. The lateral approach offers the potential advantage of a closer view of the kidney, but does so at the expense of a significantly restricted field of view. In our experience, a medial trocar configuration offers significant advantages over the lateral trocar configuration, and is, therefore, the standard approach at our high-volume center.
机译:正确放置摄像头和套管针对于微创手术的成功至关重要。对于机器人辅助的肾脏手术,已经描述了两种基本的套管针配置。内侧方法使用30°向下倾斜的镜片,模仿传统的经腹膜腹腔镜配置。使用0°或30°上角镜头方法的另一种配置将相机横向放置,从而产生类似于腹膜后方法的位置感。我们的目标是比较这两种用于机器人辅助肾脏手术的标准方法之间的差异。在对现有文献进行回顾和分析之后,我们的小组在对人类患者进行的机器人肾脏手术期间测试了内侧和外侧摄像头方法。内侧方法可提供广阔的视野,因为距目标结构的距离相对较大,并且视线更接近患者的中线。横向配置提供了显着不同的可视化效果。相对靠近目标结构和较高的视线会导致视野相对受限。两种方法之间的仪器移动性相当。文献的荟萃分析显示,尽管有通过内侧入路进行部分肾切除术的总体手术时间缩短的趋势,但两种方法均可为根治性和部分肾切除术提供可比的总体手术时间。内套管针的配置为外科医生和助手提供了熟悉的工作环境;广角视图可增强周围结构的可视化并跟踪助手插入的器械。侧入路可提供近距离观察肾脏的潜在优势,但这样做却以明显受限的视野为代价。根据我们的经验,内侧套管针配置比外侧套管针配置具有明显优势,因此是我们高容量中心的标准方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号